Bring back C4 to Support
I've been playing Support ever since BF3 and I've always ran C4 with the resupply box. This is the first Battlefield where I was forced to switch to Recon with an LMG in order to get C4. Not only doe...
Forum Discussion
Recons gadgets aren't nearly as interesting as Supports, especially considering spawn beacon was removed from Recon.
I just have one question. If it's a problem that Recon gadgets aren't interesting enough, then why do you ask Support to get a gadget that Recon has?
It seems to me that you'd give players even less reason to pick Recon.
ghostflux Recon isn't the most interesting to me personally, but at least in the beta, the spawn beacon was a lot of fun. Removing the spawn beacon from Recon made an already pretty lackluster class to be even more lackluster.
It's not really a problem if Assault gets the spawn beacon, if Recon gets an equivalent gadget in return. Unfortunately, they just removed it without any compensation. Similarly, if they give C4 to support, they must somehow compensate Recon, as there's now less reason to choose Recon.
ghostflux That's the thing I agree with. They shouldn't have removed the most fun gadget Recon had. But as for C4 they shouldn't remove it from Recon, simply just give it to Support or other classes aswell. In BF3 and BF4, C4 was never exclusive to Recon and so I don't understand why it would need to be in BF6.
In BF3 and BF4, C4 was never exclusive to Recon and so I don't understand why it would need to be in BF6.
One particular problem this caused was that there's just too many ways to damage vehicles. This diminishes the role of Engineer. As you didn't need to switch class to take care of vehicles.
