Forum Discussion
What does being "woke" have to do with ttk? If you spend 5 minutes reading comments on this forum you'll see people complaining about a great big raft of things, from lack of a server browser (which wasn't in 2042, never mentioned in 6 and never promised, but people purchased it anyway, and then complained afterwards), lack of big maps, lack of night maps, lack of water based maps, ttk/ttd, UI issues, crashes and so on. There's no single thing wrong with the title that will magically make everyone stay, there's personal gripes that make people leave. And that goes for every game out there - different people want different things.
What personal gripes, mate? Have you ever played BF2 from 2005? BF6 has a limited variety of maps. No naval map with the aircraft carrier on day 1... give me a break. The gameplay mechanics are shallow as hell, and TTK/TTD is basically a fast laser beam again.
KORD is even more ridiculous than in BF3 or 4, beaming at long distances, no problem with a 20 damage model. Conquest is boring as hell without some tactical depth, no bigger maps, and no assets on the objectives. Voice comms are useless because you will not find a Commander or a Squad Leader with any abilities. BF6 is the most dull&boring BF game I have ever played by far. No mistakes made so far LOL. I only play this game because my mates anticipated something similar to BF2/3/4.
Battle Royale... I mean, who loves to play in Solos against tanks? Whoever decided to implement tanks/IFVs in solos, do you even play this game daily? Do you understand that none of the BRs have tanks in the gameplay loop? Do you understand how Conquest game mode works compared to Battle Royale, with the impending circle of fire... and totally campy playstyle that involves all possible angles? All players decide not to fire at the tank because SOLOs ARE CAMPY. However, whoever shoots an RPG not only has to deal with a tank but also with other sneaky players.
Sorry lads, this ain`t a good BF Conquest-wise, not even a decent BR.