Good update
Controller aim assist got boosted - pc players cant win any close-to mid battles against them. The DMR shots and sniper shots for controller players are 100% hit. No option to disable crossplay. ...
Forum Discussion
The developer stated, in interview, that they nerfed aim assist in the release because the data showed that controllers were too dominant at certain ranges in the beta. Therefore, the beta had stronger aim assist. Therefore, reverting to beta's aim assist is making it stronger again.
Where are we misinformed? This is the information they gave us. THEY told us that the beta's aim assist was stronger. If anyone is misinformed, it's you or the people who released information you claim is wrong.
Ty_Ger07 Sorry but Cant be botherd typing a reply so here's AI's version.
Launch patch notes (1.0.1.0, Oct 9) mention ZERO aim-assist changes—no nerfs, no beta dominance data. Full notes:https://www.ea.com/games/battlefield/battlefield-6/news/battlefield-6-update-notes-1-0-1-0
ONLY AA talk is in 1.1.2.0 notes (Nov 17, live Nov 18): https://www.ea.com/games/battlefield/battlefield-6/news/battlefield-6-game-update-1-1-2-0
Verbatim dev text: "As we got closer to launch, we revisited aim assist tuning based on internal testing and the full range of maps and combat distances coming with release. Our goal was to make aim assist feel more effective beyond mid-range fights which was one of our focuses within Battlefield Labs and Open Beta. At launch, we increased slowdown at longer ranges, but once the game went live, we saw that this made high-zoom aiming feel less smooth and harder to control. After reviewing player feedback and gameplay data, we’re reverting aim assist back to the values some of you experienced during Open Beta and Battlefield Labs."
in summary: Beta aim assist was weaker than launch (specifically less long-range slowdown) and the Nov 18 Update 1.1.2.0 fully reverted it back to the weaker Beta tuning.
Your AI response is in opposition to what the developer stated. I believe the developer more than AI. If the developer was wrong, that's not my problem. Complain to them.
I believe the developer so will not change my opinion.
Buddy. it literally linked the patch notes EA posted.. ??
Your AI response is in opposition to what the developer stated.
Buddy, no one disagrees that they reverted to the aim assist of the beta. Buddy, you can tell me that as many times as you want. No one disagrees.
What we disagree with is whether aim assist was better in the beta or not. The developer said yes. The patch notes you linked to says yes.
What is your argument?
Their goal:
"Our goal was to make aim assist feel more effective beyond mid-range fights which was one of our focuses within Battlefield Labs and Open Beta."
They changed it. People didn't like it.
"At launch, we increased slowdown at longer ranges, but once the game went live, we saw that this made high-zoom aiming feel less smooth and harder to control."
In other words, they made it worse.
Now, they made it better.
So, it is better now, than it was. Just like it was better in the beta.
Buddy. What are you arguing? It was worse in the beta? The developer said the opposite. And the extremely brief patch notes agrees.
TLDR: It was better. They stated that in an interview. In an interview, they stated that controllers were too effective against keyboard and mouse per their collected data. They made it worse. People complained. Now they made it better again.
This doesn't need to be an argument. Just read what is out there.
Featured Places
