Forum Discussion

ghostflux's avatar
ghostflux
Seasoned Ace
6 hours ago

Team Deatchmatch makes no sense

So DICE had this brilliant idea of sneaking in a "Win 15 matches of Team Deatmatch" challenge. So I ended up trying it out. As usual the amount of games it takes to win 15 games is astonishingly high, even when you're regularly the top scorer. The amount of times there's this guy on my team getting farmed and going 3-20 makes it hard for me to understand how they even enjoy the game.

There's 8 players per team and it's a race to 100 kills. On average that means that you need about 12.5 kills per person to win the game. If you have a competent team of players, you end up winning the game in a matter of minutes. I've seen games on Saints Quarters that last less than 4 minutes.

What surprises me the most is that there's no actual effort to reward slower, less risky gameplay. Regardless of whether you think Team Deathmatch belongs in Battlefield, the fact of the matter is that the team with the highest average K/D wins. This should mean that you play in a way that minimizes deaths and maximizes kills. Instead, respawning is almost instant and medics don't get the chance to revive teammates. 

What's even worse is that the score you have does not take into account your K/D or more importantly the net amount of kills. This means the number you get when subtracting your deaths from your kills. If you're in the minus, you helped the enemy team. If you're neutral you ended up not contributing at all and only if you're in the positive, did you actually help your team.

So I'd propose a couple of changes:

  • Raise the amount of kills to win the game from 100 to 150 or even 200.
  • Increase the respawn time, so Medics actually serve a purpose.
  • Change the way the scoring works, so that the net amount of kills matters, rather than the total amount of kills.

 

2 Replies

  • Zaxoro3's avatar
    Zaxoro3
    New Adventurer
    6 hours ago

    Team Deathmatch existed already in BF2 BC2 and was fun as hell. 
    You do not have to reach 15 wins N-O-W.
    The game is barely 1 month old. Give it time, get 3 friends and go for it?!

    However i am on your side about the respawn. Death with respawn should hurt more than to wait for a possible respawn. 
    Maybe even take the point/kill away if being raised. 

  • I play a lot of TDM. It’s been around forever, and I don’t understand the question about its existence.  Might as well get rid of rush or breakthtough, no? They aren’t staples of the BF franchise if you use that logic.

    The short rounds work for me so I can get out of the game quickly if I need to and not invest 20 minutes in a “big map“ game, and I prefer the more intense action.

    This is how TDM has always worked.  There are no additional consequences for deaths other than handing a point to the other team.  Why change that? First to (50, 100, whatever) wins. That simple.  Only thing I would change about TDM is the forcing you to spawn on squad members in SQDM. If they’re in a bad spot you just spawn/die over and over. Sure, I’d take longer matches too, but I don’t think they’re that far off as they are.

About Battlefield 6 General Discussion

Join the Battlefield 6 community to get game information and updates, talk tactics and share Battlefield moments.6,284 PostsLatest Activity: 3 minutes ago