Too much dead time

Thats what make this update so amazing !! There are CQB maps then (now) there are truly big maps. 
You like CQB you play CQB - You like bigger, calmer maps, You play on them. Something for everyone!
Just like BF3 and 4 . Isent it great. 

see rdf5l3tyussa​ its an issue maybe needs to be adressed for future maps. Telling people to play other maps is not a solution. I told you the flow of the map is awful.

One of my favorite time in BFV was when they added the naval maps. It was just way better game.

You do realize that Battlefield 4 and 3 still are seen as one of the best Battlefield games their is? 
Why? Because just the reason that: SOME MAPS had a lot of downtime while some were very intense. Some people cant or dont want to be "Locked in" 110% for 30 min and still want to have "Fun"

There were A LOT of different maps that in turn brought A LOT of different game-styles, That in turn made A LOT of DIFFERENT PEOPLE and not  jus ONE GROUP very happy.  That later got enhanced with player owned servers that (to this day) only run some maps with filled servers    (that even have cue time on peak hours)

This "telling people...." is wrong: This is what people said in the release of this game when people said it was to much like "COD" and the (Cod) people kept telling people to play an other game.... well look what we got now. A real Battlefield map (in many peoples eyes) a real classic is coming back also: Wake.... gold... 

Season 5 is rumored to have 3 maps, And the other rumor is gong on visuals it will be a mix of Dawn Breaker and Las Vegas (Dawn Breaker beeing AN OTHER amazing (medium) map. 

One thing to remember tho: You and me, On this forum talking. Is not even 1% of the 30k people playing right now. 

That is a plus, but I'm running around with nothing to do for 50 percent or more per match. That's why I said this. Mirak valley, contaminated, golmud are better as bigger maps, though wouldn't lend well to naval at that size. For an infantry main, this is not a good map, as for when I play vehicles, I barley see anything either. It is early for the map, however I don't know if much with change. This is mainly for conquest and early escalation.

most of the bf 4 maps weren't even big and the big ones nobody played like golmud because as infantry you could do nothing. BF 6 golmud is way better. People have really bad memory or they just say it because they see others write it. BF 3-4 had so many issues and many maps weren't really well received.
There is a reason why 90% of playerbase were on 24/7 metro and locker.

"nobody played" Bruh....When BF4 was in its PEAK it was  what ? 50k ppl playing. Prob way more. No one was playing big maps? really

Time and time i have to remember people, Not just you, Not just in this game, That the people on the forum talking is less then 1% of the people playing, Less then that if we go on the people actually even caring of writing on a forum. This "no one is playing" is so silly to me. 

If there were 100ppl only online, Then 100% i agree but 30k now in BF6... 100k in BF4 peak days... common now. 

On top of that: Now there is 1.2k (During a week) in BF4, usually around 2.5 during weekends where some maps (the big ones) are still played on those servers as rotation and very enjoyable. Why? Its a nice MIX between faster action and slower drawn out rounds where you play in a completely different way. 

That is why maps like these are greatly needed. It shift up the gameplay between fast action to a slower phase that is needed sometimes. Not maybe from you, me, or anyone we know. But for some its a great turn around after playing 30 min of intense action on Bazar. 

The other maps I mentioned do a better job, simple as that. This is a walking/running sim.

 In... your ... opinion  m8 and half of 1% of the people caring to write on this forum 

Time to jump back in before bed! Cya on Wake Island maybe :)