I have 1 Defensive Tackle on my roster during position changes. I did this on purpose so I could provide an example of the Playing Time dealbreaker bug. Upperclassmen, especially rising seniors, have horrible playing time grades and it causes your elite players to transfer out, and then they don't sign anywhere and they disappear from the game.
I have a similar issue in recruiting. At the start of the season in building my recruiting board, in "team needs" I need 3 WR because of a senior heavy class about to graduate. I will have 2 remaining WR on my roster at the end of this season. They are ranked in the low 80s.
Approx 40% of available WRs are locked out, with the majority of them because of a "C" rating in playing time (with some players listing the playing time I have as D.). How does having 2 returning underclassman provide a "C" playing time ranking?!?!?!? I have three EMTPY WR slots to fill, with guaranteed playing time. Shouldn't that be an A for playing time?
