Please reevaluate the way visit impact is calculated

Those who are serious about recruiting have no doubt noticed how winning your game is the single biggest factor in a visit. In fact, if you lose on a visit week, it seems that it completely negates any benefit the visit would have had.

This is completely unrealistic. Winning should provide a bonus on top of the base visit boost. It should not be the end-all-be-all of whether your visit wins you the recruit or was a complete waste of hours. In real life, I cannot imagine that a recruit visits a school and comes out saying, "Yes, your campus is fantastic and the athletic facilities and trophy room you showed me are fantastic, but you lost the game by 3 points, so I won't be attending your school."

This is an area of recruiting that strongly needs to be improved. Thanks.