Forum Discussion
A) They are easier to trigger when you are a lower level. 4 levels below league cap instead of 3.
B) You don't want medals from winning, you want exp. Exp gets you crates and unlocks. Medals gets you HARDER MATCHMAKING! Matchmaking is based solely on levels, so if you win a challenge battle, you went up like half a matchmaking bracket! Now you aren't punished for winning challenge battles.
@mrkhdsn001
"The game is about strategy, but when playing with a half full deck, even the best strategist will loose to an average player with a significant superior arsenal! ... "
This isn't the case. You never play without a commander. And the starting commanders are actually some of the best ones. Strongarm is used by some of the top players, and same with Seth. Yea, they aren't flashy with ion cannons, but you aren't at a disadvantage for not being able to use them yet.
You guys need to calm down and actually read the patch notes rather than jumping down poor Dance's neck. All of this is to help you, the little guys. None of this helps the pay to win players.
- 7 years ago💞 for BattaIia ⬆⬆⬆
- 7 years ago
@LordMasterVel wrote:
💞 for BattaIia ⬆⬆⬆For Kane!
- 7 years ago
You missed the point, why should a level 10 players be stuck fighting players that have reached max level?? That’s the issue this game has. A bunch of scrubs are paying thousands to get units leveled up then losing to level back down in leagues. This shouldn’t be happening.
- 7 years agoThis game is going down the toilet. You guys take more away from the game than you add. We can’t even invite members to our alliance?? These champion events are BS. I like a challenge but going up against players who’s 2 levels higher using Avatars, something I’m not even close to unlocking absolutely blows. It’s sad cause the game is fun but zero new features unless you count the laser drones which are pointless imo. Instead of trying to cash in how about working to improve the game and features. How about alliance battles?? That would be a fun event. Establish a in game chat so all players can chat and recruit. Why have to download another app? So much potential but if your getting greedy I may have to bounce and I’m sure others will too.
- 7 years agoFYI how about fixing all the crashes and errors also. Fix the controls so units actually go where you want them. You have to have midget fingers if you want your units to go where you want them. That’s my rant. Like most companies you won’t do a thing about cause your all about the loot.
- 5 years ago
Hi this game is very unfair. I played 10 games today and nine of them I am pitted against opponents that are so much higher level than me. He send his mammoth tank and there is nothing I can do or have that can counter it. I will stop playing soon.
- 7 years ago
"A) They are easier to trigger when you are a lower level. 4 levels below league cap instead of 3."
There should be no stupid rules like this to trigger! If the enemy has 2+ level higher units its a challenge game. Nothing else to discuss further!
- 7 years ago😂😂😂 Clearly EA disagrees & only what EA consider fair matters... Life isn't F-A-I-R, why should a War Game be any different 🍻
... don't get too bent out of shape... Remember EA Has to provide abundant opportunity to Invest & Earn Profit.
There's NOTHING significantly wrong with C&C:Rivals... Balance adjustments while important & largely to be expected to some degree, ARE still SECONDARY to implementation of NEW Content & Features.
Stick around & Enjoy the Show, there's Plenty of Development Opportunity yet to come ... like ALLIANCE Territorial WARFARE ... be Glad You're Here For The Beginning 😎 👌 - 7 years ago
@freak4y0u wrote:"A) They are easier to trigger when you are a lower level. 4 levels below league cap instead of 3."
There should be no stupid rules like this to trigger! If the enemy has 2+ level higher units its a challenge game. Nothing else to discuss further!
I would argue that even when your opponent has 1+ level higher units all across the deck, then it should already be a challenge battle. After all, it *IS* a challenge to overcome an opponent who has a stronger army.
- 7 years ago
If Commanders offer no advantages then why the f*** do you have to unlock them *. Most of the battles I loose are due to the f****** ion cannon. Every time I take over a pad I get decimated by that thing. It's a pretty big advantage to be able to clear out a whole pad. I shouldn't have to play against units I don't have, the commander being one of them. The more I play the game the more obvious it becomes that this is a pay-to-play game. I get punished for having winning streaks, my rank greatly increases while my money and cards are extremely limited. I have to purposely loose every two or three rounds in order to keep my winning streak down in hopes to not advance too quickly into the next league with low level units. Over half of my battles are challenge rounds because of my league placement and unit rank. Combobulation is my user name, check out my match history. It's a fun game, but definatley has room for improvements.
- BattaIia7 years agoSeasoned AceIf you do unlock solomon will that stop your rage when he ion cannons you? =) If you face him, he requires 150 tib to use his power. So you should make a concentrated effort to harass harvester to keep his tib count low. Can't use it if he can't afford it.
On the pay to win note, have you looked at the store? How little you get for paying? You can't honestly tell me everyone but you are handing over mad stacks just to get an advantage on you =p
I'd wager the vast majority of players you have come across are f2p as well.