Forum Discussion
Again, why can you not action individual offenders separately? The vast majority of usernames would be fine, and the handful of cases of abuse should be able to be dealt with easily by a company with as many resources as EA, just like how it works on every other platform as once again this level of censorship is not deemed necessary anywhere else. You are not creating a safe space by telling LGBT people that they aren't allowed to be open about their identity because they're less important than a handful of bad actors, you are creating a space of implied hostility, and I can guarantee you if there were a single LGBT person involved in this decision they would tell you the same thing. At the very least, there should be some avenue to appeal for a manual name approval.
As I said Giiiiiiinger understand the frustrating but let's cool it a little. Let's not make wide sweeping generalisations about EA employees or why something is done in such a way.
All I'm trying to do is help and sharing the context as to why some username are not allowed.
There's nothing more that I can add to this conversation.
We will pas your feedback on.
Darko
Community Highlights
- EA_Lanna1 month ago
Community Manager
- EA_David1 year ago
Community Admin