Forum Discussion
226 Replies
- @TomasSlb24 That's all well and good but we have all spent money on this product and we have a faulty product. We all know the same bugs will be in F125.
They either give us all a full refund for F124 or have to give us F125. We all know neither will happen - @mattwells149852 Well, I understand that. I'm a costumer my self and I'm sad and mad about it.
Of course that, when I say they give up on the game, I'm not saying they should not update the game anymore. They have to. I'm saying the game should get to a slow development state.
They have to nail F1 25, they have no other way to actually compensate how bad this game was. Maybe a bigger discount to the ones who bought F1 24 would be appreciated, but that is already asking too much from EA. - ScarDuck144 months agoLegend
The game is very very bad but it’s not broken. You don’t get refunds for buying bad products after 3-4 months. Thats down to the consumer for not doing necessary research by watching/reading reviews before buying. State off gaming these days. I never buy into the marketing rubbish or gaming news media that’s in the pocket off AAA companies. I don’t buy any new releases game for atleast a month after it launches. Then I think I’ve waited this long… May aswell wait until it goes on sale. Within 3 months off release you can get up to 50% discount.
if everyone done the same it would force AAA companies to develop better products
- Nellix824 months agoNew Ace@TomasSlb24 for me they have to raise their hands and say we are not capable of doing anything else.... this year they have ruined the fun for many of us.... scarduck is right when he says that we have to wait and not be fooled by the videos that are now clearly a joke to the players and if necessary not to buy it at all.... so the copy and paste will end with them maybe even the license per cm.... 1 month they are not even capable of fixing the ferrari sound what are we talking about?....
- @Nellix82 Agreed, they should take their pride off, and admit the error.
What ScarDuck said, with all due respect, I can't agree. I understand what he's saying, but we should not be waiting 1 month to see if the games work or not. The games should be 99% ready to play. Bugs are part of it, every game gets released with them, in this era. But a game should be in a state that the basics actually work, not what we have in F1 24.
The problem now is that the DEADLINE is not viewed as a problem anymore. Back then every company saw the deadline has a problem, because the game had to be released as playable as possibly and patching the game was, well, not an easier thing as it is now.
And EA/Codemasters are being penalized every year that passes. We see that sales are going down, and even if next years game gets better, the sales at the start will probably go down again. That's why F1 25 is do or die. If it hits, F1 26 can be a big one. If it's a bust, then it's' over. - Nellix824 months agoNew Ace
it could also be that they remove the license for the 26th
For the most part I’m OK with the game, and I still enjoy destressing for 30 min after work each day. My 2 issues are Brazil (which I just avoid) and the DRS trains. The game is not better now than when I bought it and my main complaint about customization for My Team has fallen on deaf ears.
Some other issues would require more work, like being able to change the AI when restarting a session (a feature that did exist at one point). Or the ability to change the AI mid session ( to deal with weather) or the ability to turn weather off altogether (another low hanging fruit option)
But I know the game can be broken with the next patch, that is partly the issue with games now. You can’t really say the game is 4.5 months old when each patch effectively creates a new game.
I think it was 2019 or 2018 when the game was great for me, and then a patch addressed traction and created a situation where I was fine in the dry and the wet but would be 2 seconds off the pace in the transition. No matter what I would lose 10 seconds over the 5 laps where the track went from one to the other. Game goes from close to brilliant to painfully bad at several races a season.
Some player options could fix the risks of patches making the game worse but in the end we could pay for what is perceived to be a perfect F1 game to have it broken the day after we buy it, or 4 months later.
So for game companies, like car manufacturers, it is about trust. Do I trust them to make a good product this year? That trust is based on their history of making good products. My last 2 examples are 22 and 24. Not sure where I am at on that one heading towards 25.
So even if F1 25 75th anniversary edition or whatever it will be called comes out to rave player reviews, is there incentive to oay full price for a game that can be broken at any moment with an errant patch?
- ScarDuck144 months agoLegend@TomasSlb24 No we shouldn’t have to wait. But if you want games that work as intended. The only way that’s going to happen is if we don’t buy them at launch. If we all wait until games go on sale and when biggest bugs are fixed. It will force EA to into changing. Probably the only way they will change. It’s the biggest power we have. If people continue to buy games at launch in the state they currently are. No reason for EA to change what they do
- IanM2824 months agoSeasoned Ace
I personally think EA have caused themselves a lot of problems going forward after the state of F124. For many and me included, I've lost a lot of trust in them.
There has been a downward trend in sales since they took over from Codemasters. There may be many reasons for that, but for many it's just how poor the games have become since they got involved.
I think we have to not only just look to see how bad F124 was and still is, but also F122. Whilst nowhere near as bad as F124, it was a massive step backwards from F121, which I believe was mostly Codemasters good work. F121 was excellent and by far the best of them all over the more recent titles and the correlation is clear why, EA weren't fully involved!
F123 had it's flaws, but was seriously on a different level compared to F124. But again not as good as F12020 and F121.
By EA introducing the huge disaster which was F1 Life, followed by F1 World and now things like Fanzone, people have had enough. Especially when there are so many basic things that can be dramatically improved.
I have absolutely no idea why or who comes up with these gimmicks and thinks it will be just what we all want. It's so far detached from what we all want and that's the truth.
I'd absolutely love to hear their explanation for how we arrived at F124. It has absolutely nothing in it whatsoever. We have gone from classic cars, more circuits, breaking point (I never played it) but at least it was something. Much more helmets, much more general customisation and better handling models. All F124 has to offer is a supposed all new career mode, which lets face it is more like a little bit of polish. Hardly new and ground breaking is it?
F124 has been a massive disappointment and a kick in the teeth for those who wasted £90 on it. They released a game which was never ever tested properly, absolutely terrible AI, worst handling model ever made, decimated the store of race wear and the turnaround time to fix the most absolutely glaring bugs is desperately slow.
How can we go from a game like F12020 and F121 to F124? The game has been completely striped back with less content that ever. Is it any wonder why sales are down?
EA, it's time you actually started listening to the people in this community and stop trying to come up with tacky and meaningless features that do not belong in an F1 game!
Instead focus on the core of the game and get that much better as a primary priority. F125 absolutely has to be so much better.
- HuskyBailo4 months agoNew Traveler
Why are you all making the game so bad? I actually think it's very good. You could add a bit more, like online training to compare yourself and build good setups. Unfortunately, there is no tire wear in time trials. It would also be nice if you could set the wheel suspension differently. The menu should definitely be changed so that you can choose the weather before the time trial. The cars drive very well otherwise, so don't make everything bad, because it isn't. I'm almost 60 years old and if I can handle it well, young people should be able to handle it too. I drive with a controller on an AI strength of between 85 and 90, so please don't tell me the game isn't good
About F1® 24 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 7 hours ago
- 21 hours ago
- 22 hours ago
- 24 hours ago