@Ultrasonic_77 wrote:
Also, with a game as unpopular as F1 22 I can't help but feel the dominant reaction if we were told we'd be sticking with it for another year would not be great!
I can understand that but, on the other hand, the game as of today isn't so bad. I mean, not great definitely, but not so bad - at least its offline sections. I still would take it...
But your post made think of the online dudes, they're suffering big time.
@Meza994 wrote:
@dancrodriguesIt could be worse true but for some of us the game just NEEDS improvements in certain regards, be it the entire tyre temps/pressure/compound complexity for me, an actually realistic suspension setup with depth for Mario or just another deep dive up the rear from Bottas for our favourite duck😜..
As Mario pointed out its the exact same for 3 years now and actually in the least pleasant way of all.. I rather find myself playing F1 2021 or F1 2018 with more realistic dirty air (fully realistic is sadly not possible/working with the AI😩) and little more accurate car performances.. They just have a more pleasant and rewarding handling model while still having almost the same features😅
But that's exactly the point of the discussion I proposed above: if they assured us that these issues could be made right given them a 2 years-time, would us be willing to wait?
(because releasing it yearly isn't working wonders...)
TBH New game can’t get here soon enough. I rather spend time posting on here than play the current game. As you all know I’m a happy chatter. I’ve got to know many of the EA guys. They are actually all very good guys and passionate about gaming. There is a genuine desire and effort to improve how they deal with bugs and issues going forward.
Suggestion threads are only good for us to bounce ideas off eachother and maybe an occasional dev will read through them for some inspiration and maybe pick one or to for ideas for future titles. On Codies forums you could see who was currently on the forums and which threads they were looking at. Multiple times I saw devs looking at suggestion threads. But not once did they ever post on them… no matter how hard you try and get their attention. As it’s not something that needs immediate attention.
like I’ve said in other threads. Communication when it comes to issues and bugs needs to be better so they are fixed faster and not going on for months as some major issues still are.. I believe this will get better in next years game
Whether the gameplay sucks or not 🤷🏻♂️
@dancrodrigues wrote:
@Meza994 wrote:
@dancrodriguesIt could be worse true but for some of us the game just NEEDS improvements in certain regards, be it the entire tyre temps/pressure/compound complexity for me, an actually realistic suspension setup with depth for Mario or just another deep dive up the rear from Bottas for our favourite duck😜..
As Mario pointed out its the exact same for 3 years now and actually in the least pleasant way of all.. I rather find myself playing F1 2021 or F1 2018 with more realistic dirty air (fully realistic is sadly not possible/working with the AI😩) and little more accurate car performances.. They just have a more pleasant and rewarding handling model while still having almost the same features😅But that's exactly the point of the discussion I proposed above: if they assured us that these issues could be made right given them a 2 years-time, would us be willing to wait?
(because releasing it yearly isn't working wonders...)
I’d be keen for them to sacrifice a game this year (or next year or whenever) to long-term, have a fully-functioning, extremely popular and enjoyable game. It’s something that I think I brought up before, but a lot of people (and fair enough) don’t really like the idea, because they want to have the new game ASAP.
@ScarDuck14 wrote:Suggestion threads are only good for us to bounce ideas off eachother and maybe an occasional dev will read through them for some inspiration and maybe pick one or to for ideas for future titles. On Codies forums you could see who was currently on the forums and which threads they were looking at. Multiple times I saw devs looking at suggestion threads. But not once did they ever post on them… no matter how hard you try and get their attention. As it’s not something that needs immediate attention.
Well, that’s why I made the F1 Game Community Suggestions Hub. For that exact purpose. It’s going well so far too btw!
It would be so good to see which EA/CM person was online on the forum, and which forum thread they were looking at. Even if they don’t reply (which don’t get me wrong, would still be amazing), it’s still great to see what they’re looking at. Is this something you could discuss with your EA overlords/whatever they’re called?
@Radoko34Wouldn’t be something I would. It’s not my place. It would add little use for a lot work. I only ever noticed cause I’m ever present. I very much doubt anyone else found it useful. If it was they would have already added it.
Ok. Thanks.
I would certainly find it useful.
Or, even if they just had a little sticker/badge go next to a thread that symbolises if the thread has been viewed (at any time) by an EA staff.
Anyways, just a side thought I guess.
I don't think they need to sacrifice a year and i don't believe that's the solution. What they should do, is to hire more devs helping the current teams (if i understand correctly, they have 2 teams working on F1) resolving the current bugs and then focus on new features, handling, etc. All they have to do is to hire more devs and lose some money (their salary), which on long terms, i think it will bring them more money because a better and complet game + features the community ask for can only lead to higher sales.
Are they allowed to give the rights to make the licensed F1 game to two different game companies at the same time?
This would be so good, because both companies would challenge each other to make a better and better game, almost like a race to make the best F1 game possible. And, from FOM’s perspective, they could make more money selling the right to two different companies (sure with two companies having the rights they would be worth less, but they’d definitely still be expensive).
Besides, it’s not as though EA (at the end of their current deal until the end of 2025) could go ‘No, we don’t want to let you sell the rights to another company as well.’ Because it’s FOM in charge, not EA.
The FIFA one is a great example. I think FOM should definitely strongly consider selling the rights to another company. It’s a win for them, a win for us, and ultimately, a win for the game developers as they push each other to make better and better games.
Also, there is nothing forcing us to buy both games made by both developers. We just get to choose the one that we think is better or has something we really want in the game. But, by all means, if you wanted to buy both games, you definitely could.
I don’t think it would make it financially viable tbh. Football games have a gigantic player base. F1 specific games don’t. If 2 developers released a F1 game equally as good/bad. Would mead a 50 50 market share give or take. So with that sort off risk development budgets would be smaller meaning higher likelihood off a worse game
@Radoko34 wrote:Are they allowed to give the rights to make the licensed F1 game to two different game companies at the same time?
FOM could choose to do whatever they want once the current contract ends (subject to any long term clauses) but games companies will pay more for exclusive rights which I think is why this is how it tends to go with moet games. It's also probably more straightforward for the rights holder to just deal with a single games company to be honest.
It's on console where the lack of competition is the biggest factor I think as there's no alternative way to race all the F1 tracks, unlike on PC I believe. For me personally it's the tracks that more than anything else that makes me stick with the F1 games. I don't own GT7 for example.
@Ultrasonic_77I own GT7 waste off £70… Single player So boringly dull. Cafe books is almost as bad as F1 Life. If sophy gets fully implemented I may play it again. But like you I also hate pretend tracks no matter how good they may be
@Radoko34 wrote:Ok. Thanks.
I would certainly find it useful.
Or, even if they just had a little sticker/badge go next to a thread that symbolises if the thread has been viewed (at any time) by an EA staff.Anyways, just a side thought I guess.
Trust me they view every thread
