I am using Ingram (86) no xfactors and Vejmelka (84) also no xfactors (I am using a version of Utah, so my team stats are not overly high either)
- Ingram has SV% .875 and 2.50 GAA - record of 12-11-3, Vejmelka .890 SV% and 2.21 GAA with a record of 6-2-2.
From what I have seen in NHL games going back to at least NHL 20, the SV% have been not always something you can look at unless you are more just simming games (I am not sure why that is the case either). In past games it was usually the AI getting 9-15 shots max to the 25-35 shots for my team and losing the game 3-2 or something (NHL 22 was bad for this), so I feel that was part of the issue. GAA is usually more of a normal stat I judge my goalies on as it seems to reflect the gameplay better overall.
I know that both my goalies and AI team goalies do have issues where pucks will bounce off the blocker or glove and in but I see it even between my team and others overall (depending on the goalies overall). Plus those type of goals do happen in real life, also goalies having bad starts to games (3 goals on 5 shots per example). I tend to find when stuff like that is going on, I'll take a timeout, see if that helps, if not ill switch goalies. Not sure if team chemistry has any affect this or not ( I turn morale off as its still not really functioning and hasn't for many years).
I have learned to play a very defensive game and use the breaks or mistakes the AI does to get rushes or chances on net.(GFPG are 3.14 and my GAPG is 2.44)
I also make sure to keep my lines fresh so I'm not left out with a tired line. I find the times I do leave them out too long it tends to end up in the back of the net.
"crazy amount of aggression the CPU has" when it comes to this - I can't say what is different. They do push for the puck and with the lower speed and stamina I have learned to do more quick passes instead of single player skates up the ice
- I do turn down the AI learning and adjustment to make it more level to the experience that works for my gameplay.