Then I fail to see why the game needs a brand new logo. Does PvZ 2 warrant one? It's just the original game with a 2 beside it. But it does have a totally different art-style. Or Garden Warfare, because it's way more gritty and detailed. Does it warrant an original logo?
I don't want PvZ 3 to be a fish out of water and stick out, nor continue the history of bad PvZ reboots we've been going through.
I just don't see why this is such a big issue when it is usually a must for a new sequel that has a fresh new art-style to have it's logo match with that new art-style so that it doesn't confuse people into thinking that whole game also uses the same art-style as the original game in some way, which is what the OG poster is kinda talking about here.
... You still didn't answer my question. Why doesn't PvZ 2 get a new logo? Or Garden Warfare? Why does this game need a new logo (for the fifth time?)
I don't know myself. it's just something that happens whenever a game gets a clearly new art-style made, that sometimes a completely new logo also gets created just for it to fit with that art-style in question.
Because unlike any other official pvz game this one is trying to be unique, the log matching the artstyle should be one of the first things that should be done ESPECIALLY since pvz3 evolved is unlike any other pvz game
So PvZ 2 isn't unique? Garden Warfare isn't unique? Heroes isn't unique? All of these games are different but use the same logo as a basis. And they have distinct art-styles. Why does this game need one?
