Let me be the first to request that Skrinking Violet is nerfed
Should be -1 not -2, if it's going to destroy them as well.
also, i seem to ONLY be playing against Rose today, which says a lot
Forum Discussion
24 Replies
- Sorry. You’re not the first to request. See Break me a Give.
Lol.
Though the kill is necessary. You don’t want to play Rose with three lanes clogged with useless zombies. I've been playing against mostly Rose players for a good 6 weeks now.
And I keep using my Impfinity deck that destroys her > 90% of the time.
As for Shrinking Violet, that card seem to have been made specifically to deal with decks with lots of small minions. (For example; to help Rose deal with Impfinity)
It is devastating, but also expensive.
It's actually very similar to the one jaydabbler has been posting.
The key cards are: Tanklyosaurus with Barrel of Barrels, Dr Spacetime, Laser Base Alpha, Quickdraw Conman, Disco-Naut, Quasar Wizard, and Imposter. The rest I switch around (Although I almost always have a couple Space Cowboys and a Zombot Plankwalker in the mix).
- Congratulations on having a fast imp deck, but you’re wrong about Shrinking Violet being an expensive card. It’s a potential 3-for-1 at the same casting cost as condition single-card killers like “destroy a zombie on the ground” and “destroy a random plant.”
It should be a more expensive card, like all other multi-kill tricks in the game. (Consider the Zombot stompy card only bounces plants on the ground at 7. How many ground lanes are there? Three. Shrinking Violet has the same power level at 4. It should at least be 5 or 6.) To this I would say “Come on Jay!” Don’t make me start listing the Zombie combos that I have seen since the release that are OP. You have to give us plant players something. Zombies have been dominating for months. I haven’t tried out this card yet but I guess I should.
- Please, a complete and comprehensive list of the zombie combos that are “OP.”
:-p. - Also, this post is about a card, not a combo. “Always OP” is worse than “OP in combination with X.”
puntwothree wrote:
Also, this post is about a card, not a combo. “Always OP” is worse than “OP in combination with X.”Lol. We have caveats here? You’re trying to compare apples to oranges because of the way the turn base system works in this game.
