3vs3 GAC really?
So CG moved the crystal income to GAC making it the most important area of the game, and now they’re forcing us to play a stupid mode they invented just to give players something different a lot of ti...
Forum Discussion
"Wed_Santa;c-2355983" wrote:"zatho;c-2355981" wrote:"Wed_Santa;c-2355976" wrote:
I always worry with these threads that the devs might take them seriously. 3 v 3 brings a bit of fizz to the game. It’s unpredictable and pushes people out of their comfort zones - which is where all the best bits of life happen. Remember Ray Bradbury said that the secret to life was to jump off the cliff and learn how to grow wings on the way down.
Me and my Wampa are looking forward to the headlong rush towards irrational death very much. See you there!
People want more variety in the game. 3 vs 3 would be perfect if you did not lose crystals by making wrong decisions. With a sandbox-mode where you could test teams composed of three characters, it would be much better.
How dull would it be if there was no jeopardy attached to our decisions? It’s not a primary school sports day where everyone gets a prize for trying - it’s (ahem) an, well it’s a little game on a phone - but still my point stands. Decisions should have consequences- that’s agency.
You still have to decide which teams you set in defense and which you use for offense. The possibility of testing a team in general does not take away the RnG or the influence of you opponents mods.
Edit: removed last sentence
