3vs3 GAC really?
So CG moved the crystal income to GAC making it the most important area of the game, and now they’re forcing us to play a stupid mode they invented just to give players something different a lot of ti...
Forum Discussion
"zatho;c-2355981" wrote:"Wed_Santa;c-2355976" wrote:
I always worry with these threads that the devs might take them seriously. 3 v 3 brings a bit of fizz to the game. It’s unpredictable and pushes people out of their comfort zones - which is where all the best bits of life happen. Remember Ray Bradbury said that the secret to life was to jump off the cliff and learn how to grow wings on the way down.
Me and my Wampa are looking forward to the headlong rush towards irrational death very much. See you there!
People want more variety in the game. 3 vs 3 would be perfect if you did not lose crystals by making wrong decisions. With a sandbox-mode where you could test teams composed of three characters, it would be much better.
.......You want to devote ALOT of time to a sandbox mode we don't and never will have given how many various 3v3 comps you can make. It'd take you minimum of a week to even just do a couple of the larger factions. But what really bugs me is the whole "3v3 would be great if we didn't lose crystals by making wrong decisions" sentence. Seriously?! You've taken offense to someone responding to you but imagine if you'd said 5v5 instead of 3v3. You'd be laughed out of here. :joy: You lose crystals all the time by making the wrong decisions in GAC. That's an element of all PVP gameplay.
