That's 4x day for 10 days. Each. Back to grind for grind's sake: no thank you. I'm noping out of Conquest again because CG is determined to make the game mode anything other than fun. Seriously, CG, what do you think is fun about setting timers 4x a day for 10 days in a row to use teams that can't win anything without the right data disks, which means constantly doing paperwork-shuffling to get the right disks on for the right teams, multiple times per day? No. It's not fun. I don't care what the rewards are: the purpose of a game is to have fun. Try, really TRY, to remember that for next conquest. I'm out for 3 months.

It's not about fun. It's about money.

If they don't make it fun, they won't get my money.

"MasterSeedy;c-2357436" wrote:If they don't make it fun, they won't get my money. Did you see the reward? That is all you need to know.

Did you see where I said, and I quote: I don't care what the rewards are: the purpose of a game is to have fun. I really, literally don't care what the rewards are if the event isn't fun. I'm not grinding for it.

"MasterSeedy;d-255712" wrote:That's 4x day for 10 days. Each. Back to grind for grind's sake: no thank you. I'm noping out of Conquest again because CG is determined to make the game mode anything other than fun. Seriously, CG, what do you think is fun about setting timers 4x a day for 10 days in a row to use teams that can't win anything without the right data disks, which means constantly doing paperwork-shuffling to get the right disks on for the right teams, multiple times per day? No. It's not fun. I don't care what the rewards are: the purpose of a game is to have fun. Try, really TRY, to remember that for next conquest. I'm out for 3 months. Where did you see the feat list?

40 wins each with Sith Empire & Old Republic?

CCyrilS
3 years ago
"Ravens1113;c-2357482" wrote:
"CCyrilS;c-2357472" wrote:
"StarSon;c-2357459" wrote:
"MasterSeedy;c-2357443" wrote:
Did you see where I said, and I quote:

I don't care what the rewards are: the purpose of a game is to have fun.

I really, literally don't care what the rewards are if the event isn't fun. I'm not grinding for it.

You don't care and won't spend or grind. Lots of others do care and will both spend and grind.

Yep. Then I'll see you on the other threads crying about how terrible the game is/devs are.

And we will see you defending CG tooth and nail lol.

Well if someone gonna throw money at conquest over and over then turn around complain about the game...
CCyrilS
3 years ago
"StarSon;c-2357488" wrote:
"CCyrilS;c-2357472" wrote:
"StarSon;c-2357459" wrote:
"MasterSeedy;c-2357443" wrote:
Did you see where I said, and I quote:

I don't care what the rewards are: the purpose of a game is to have fun.

I really, literally don't care what the rewards are if the event isn't fun. I'm not grinding for it.

You don't care and won't spend or grind. Lots of others do care and will both spend and grind.

Yep. Then I'll see you on the other threads crying about how terrible the game is/devs are.

Well, not real sure what that has to do with anything? I didn't contradict that just now.

Also, I rarely complain about the actual game, just the devs.

"CCyrilS;c-2357483" wrote:
"Ravens1113;c-2357482" wrote:
"CCyrilS;c-2357472" wrote:
"StarSon;c-2357459" wrote:
"MasterSeedy;c-2357443" wrote:
Did you see where I said, and I quote:

I don't care what the rewards are: the purpose of a game is to have fun.

I really, literally don't care what the rewards are if the event isn't fun. I'm not grinding for it.

You don't care and won't spend or grind. Lots of others do care and will both spend and grind.

Yep. Then I'll see you on the other threads crying about how terrible the game is/devs are.

And we will see you defending CG tooth and nail lol.

Well if someone gonna throw money at conquest over and over then turn around complain about the game...

And I haven't ever spent money on Conquest, so not sure what that has to do with anything here either.

I used "you" generically... referring to those who continue to do something and expect a different result.

Second quote wasn't even a reply to you.
ButtercupBrawler
New Spectator
3 years ago
So I have a choice of chasing the inquisitor kills and purge feats or walking away and just getting t6 chest.

I only need 60 interceptor shards so t6 works there. If I buy the new character shards I lose about 4500 crystal in gear but since I will save about 2k not chasing t7.
That reduces it to about 2500 crystal lost gear and the difference between the t6 and t7 rewards which is mostly some mod mats which are no longer desperately needed.

Looks like I get a less stressful next 3 conquests because the losses in no way justify trying to rush to acquire a full inquisitor squad as that would cost much much more. Crystal and money are worth more spent elsewhere.
Persimius
Seasoned Traveler
3 years ago
"LordHelmet10001;c-2357527" wrote:
On another note. Does anyone think CG realizes that they just significantly decreased the value of their conquest pass which was already a waste?

Actually they increased it. Pretty sure you can get 7* with 2 gold and 1 red create if you buy the $10 pass.
Persimius
Seasoned Traveler
3 years ago
"LordHelmet10001;c-2357530" wrote:
"StarSon;c-2357529" wrote:
"LordHelmet10001;c-2357527" wrote:
On another note. Does anyone think CG realizes that they just significantly decreased the value of their conquest pass which was already a waste?

Actually they increased it. Pretty sure you can get 7* with 2 gold and 1 red create if you buy the $10 pass.

But that again assumes the person bought enough of the inquisitors to get red crate.

Not really, since it means you don't need good Inquisitors until the July Conquest, buying you an extra 2 months to work on them, which should be plenty of time to have them at 7*.
CCyrilS
3 years ago
"StarSon;c-2357531" wrote:
"LordHelmet10001;c-2357530" wrote:
"StarSon;c-2357529" wrote:
"LordHelmet10001;c-2357527" wrote:
On another note. Does anyone think CG realizes that they just significantly decreased the value of their conquest pass which was already a waste?

Actually they increased it. Pretty sure you can get 7* with 2 gold and 1 red create if you buy the $10 pass.

But that again assumes the person bought enough of the inquisitors to get red crate.

Not really, since it means you don't need good Inquisitors until the July Conquest, buying you an extra 2 months to work on them, which should be plenty of time to have them at 7*.

So you can spend now for the option to wait and spend more later.
Lochaber1984
3 years ago
It will be tough but as long as there is some wriggle room we might be ok.

I have 100K crystals saved up but not sure I want to burn it to bring all inquisitors to 7*
"StarSon;c-2357529" wrote:
"LordHelmet10001;c-2357527" wrote:
On another note. Does anyone think CG realizes that they just significantly decreased the value of their conquest pass which was already a waste?

Actually they increased it. Pretty sure you can get 7* with 2 gold and 1 red create if you buy the $10 pass.

I like this idea!
HolySithblade
3 years ago
Grand total point for feats is 334 keycards right? Isnt red crate 630? Did they close the wiggle room for missing certain feats or is it still the same?

Looking at these feats, they suck some serious lintburgers. :(
Persimius
Seasoned Traveler
3 years ago
"NicWester;c-2357637" wrote:
Look, look, look--you can go all out and grind and spend and get Malgus in 3 months. Or you can go at a relaxed pace, not spend, and get him in 6 months. In the final analysis, if you're spending to get him faster, what you're really doing is spending to get 3 months of shard shop currency 3 months from now.

Yeah, yeah, yeah--other people will spend and grind and whatever. But who cares? How many people do you think are going to do that? Just let them pay to keep the game afloat and ride their coattails.

Actually, if you get gold crate I’m pretty sure you get him in 4 Conquests. Also, even without 7* Inquisitors it should be possible to get red crate without spending.

But ultimately what you potentially lose is GAC matches (and maybe TW) in the meantime. If it does take you 6 Conquests, that’s 3 months if disadvantage in PVP. Does that matter to you is the question.
CCyrilS
3 years ago
"StarSon;c-2357638" wrote:
"NicWester;c-2357637" wrote:
Look, look, look--you can go all out and grind and spend and get Malgus in 3 months. Or you can go at a relaxed pace, not spend, and get him in 6 months. In the final analysis, if you're spending to get him faster, what you're really doing is spending to get 3 months of shard shop currency 3 months from now.

Yeah, yeah, yeah--other people will spend and grind and whatever. But who cares? How many people do you think are going to do that? Just let them pay to keep the game afloat and ride their coattails.

Actually, if you get gold crate I’m pretty sure you get him in 4 Conquests. Also, even without 7* Inquisitors it should be possible to get red crate without spending.

But ultimately what you potentially lose is GAC matches (and maybe TW) in the meantime. If it does take you 6 Conquests, that’s 3 months if disadvantage in PVP. Does that matter to you is the question.

A few more losses equates to how many crystals? Could I just buy them for less than Malgus costs?