50/50? Pretty please?
Whadda ya say, CG? Can we get an option to take a .500 reward for GAC when you run 3v3 (hopefully no more than once a year), and skip the anguish and frustration?
Forum Discussion
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2360883" wrote:"CCyrilS;c-2360837" wrote:"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2360827" wrote:"CCyrilS;c-2360824" wrote:"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2360821" wrote:
I love how people argue 5v5 vs 3v3 like there's any objective fact to which is "better" has more "variety" or is more "interesting" and less "stale". It boils down to personal preference and experience--that's it.
We could objectively prove that the same squads are used more often in 5v5, once the data is available on .gg.
I welcome some objective analysis. However, unless you can control for league/division, you'll have a hard time making a claim meaningful to anyone in particular.
Not really. There's a reason people already feel this way. You're the one trying to prove otherwise.
I feel like you've lost sight of my point. My point is that the variability level may be different for different players, which means both experiences can be valid across the playerbase spectrum, and that arguing 3v3 vs 5v5 cannot be objective and is therefore not worthy of discussion beyond stating one's personal preference.
So unless you have data that can be parsed to players in a given SR band, what swgoh.gg provides is too broad to go against one's lived experience, imo.
Also, I have not given an opinion as to which mode results in a more diverse experience because I have not formed one yet because I've got 3 rounds of 3v3 vs a couple dozen of 5v5.
That's a lot of words, but I still say 3v3 has more variety.
