"Stenun;c-1880784" wrote:
"Kyno;c-1880777" wrote:
"Stenun" wrote:
So the options are:
Have a participation requirement and then a lot of smaller guilds will fall apart.
OR
Have no participation requirements, everyone can see first hand what Geonosis is like, guilds lose one round of Hoth rewards.
So if a small guild can try the content and fail they will not fall apart the same way they would if they cant meet the requirements?
Maybe they would fall apart but then that would be because of their choice and not something imposed on them by the Devs. Surely you can see the difference? The Devs are currently jeopardising my guild; I'm not. If we have the choice to try the new TB and I choose poorly, time after time after time, then that would be me jeopardising my guild.
In the first case, we don't deserve to fall apart just because the Devs say so. In the second, we would fall apart due to poor leadership.
Do you really not see the difference and why so many people prefer the second option?
They are falling apart due to the new content, I see no difference in the reason they choose to use.
Many players choose to stay with thier guild for many reasons when new content comes out, some choose to leave. The reason is a personal choice. The devs make the content, whether it is the difficulty or a gate they place in another way, it is placed by them. That makes leaving solely the players choice, because the gate is there regardless.
Capital Games Team
