Forum Discussion

hblej75ux9b6's avatar
2 days ago

An idea

My idea is that we do a proving grounds event for Luther Rael. I’ve been trying to spend conquest credits on him, but haven’t seen him in a while.

 

Update:

Should we start a joke thread instead?

5 Replies

  • I don’t like the idea of user created cheat discussions threads, primarily because naming and shaming is against the Forum TOS that we all accepted when creating an account. 

    Even so, there have been dozens of threads like this before and lax moderation has sometimes seen those threads survive for several days before they are anonymised or deleted - so the idea that these threads would force CG to notice anything is kinda debunked already. 

    The main reason I don’t like the idea of these threads, though, is that there have been a large number of false accusations, often made by people who have limited understanding of how the game works (both in terms of battles being client side, so nobody can cheat on defence and just general understanding of kits and synergy). 

    We know the devs do ban cheaters, because there have been plenty of “please give me my account back, I’ve learned from my mistakes” threads. Could they be more proactive? Definitely. Could they be more transparent? Probably. Will forumers grabbing their torch and pitchforks help? Almost certainly not. 

  • hblej75ux9b6's avatar
    hblej75ux9b6
    2 days ago

    DarjeloSalas​ I agree. That’s why I mentioned it might be a bad idea, mostly for the naming part since, like you said, the forum has the rule against it. Actually I’m going to cut that part out of the discussion thread.

  • When I clicked on the thread the OPs post was about cheaters.  Now it reads:

    hblej75ux9b6 wrote:

    My l idea is that we do a proving grounds event for Luther Rael. I’ve been trying to spend conquest credits on him, but haven’t seen him in a while.

    Bug?  Been changed?  I'm losing my mind?

    The issue is, we have (and never had) any idea on what is going on at CG regarding cheaters.  My hunch is that checking is such a seldom thing, they don't want to be more transparent.  I don't think they need to let us know about the results.  However, they should acknowledge reports and let us know they'll look into it.

    That said, I think a lot of the claims are false.  I've been playing since the end of 2017, and to the best of my knowledge, I've never encountered a cheater.  Watching streams and content creators, I've only seen 1.  I think though, issues of cheating in Ship Arena are more common than my experience.  In GAC, I don't think it's common at all.

    There is a 'cheaters' discord channel, that looks into possible cheating.  I believe, it is very good and pretty accurate.  Probably, that's a better place to go than here for this sort of thing.

     

  • hblej75ux9b6's avatar
    hblej75ux9b6
    2 days ago

    harvestmouse1​ Hi! I’m so sorry, I changed it earlier as I mentioned below, thank you for your patience. I agree with you on the scarcity of cheaters, I have only seen one in ship arenas but managed to pass them by beating someone higher than they.

  • harvestmouse1's avatar
    harvestmouse1
    Seasoned Ace
    2 days ago
    hblej75ux9b6 wrote:

    I have only seen one in ship arenas but managed to pass them by beating someone higher than they.

    I'm pretty sure you can't cheat on defence.  So, if they're cheating on offence, they're an easy snack on defence.  That said, I have no idea about attempts with cheaters.  It maybe a case of just clicking a button and putting you back down.  

About SWGOH General Discussion

Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.81,962 PostsLatest Activity: 29 minutes ago