"littleMAC77;c-2012686" wrote:
"JacenRoe;c-2012559" wrote:
"Monel;c-2012508" wrote:
"TVF;c-2012469" wrote:
"JacenRoe;c-2012345" wrote:
I would trade all that swag for a Mace rework. :'(
I wouldn't.
Agreed. A reworked Mace doesnt equal a good Mace.
That makes no sense. The current Mace is trash. So he will have to be reworked to be good. They might miss the mark, but it provides a higher than 0% chance of him being improved. In fact he is so bad it would be really hard not to make him better even on accident.
Anybody else remember the first GG rework and community reaction?
"Monel;c-2012725" wrote:
"JacenRoe;c-2012559" wrote:
"Monel;c-2012508" wrote:
"TVF;c-2012469" wrote:
"JacenRoe;c-2012345" wrote:
I would trade all that swag for a Mace rework. :'(
I wouldn't.
Agreed. A reworked Mace doesnt equal a good Mace.
That makes no sense. The current Mace is trash. So he will have to be reworked to be good. They might miss the mark, but it provides a higher than 0% chance of him being improved. In fact he is so bad it would be really hard not to make him better even on accident.
Really? Look at all the upset people after GG got his initial rework. People spent money and gear and felt they were cheated.
I didn’t say a rework would definitely make him great. He is currently worthless garbage. No rework means a 0% chance he will get better. A rework means at least some chance higher than 0% that he will get better.
And GG got better when he was reworked. He went from worthless and unusable to part of a mid level team. Then he got another touch up that pushed him into top tier.
Is ironclad certainty that Mace stay total garbage better than even a small chance he be useable?