"Zwanni_420;c-2029144" wrote:
"DRD1812;c-2028941" wrote:
You know, if he'd just answered the question during the Q&A instead of talking nonsense, then it wouldn't look so bad that he's continuing to not answer the question now.
I remember reading the question and thinking yes, great question, then read the response and thought, what TH were they reading? Pretty straight forward question, not sure how it could be interpreted another way.
To be fair to CG on this one, they have been pelted with questions/requests for running 2 TBs concurrently since DS Geno was released (and even before then), so they probably (incorrectly) assumed the question was just another one of those when they skimmed it during the Q&A session. In hindsight, they should have read the question a bit closer before responding, but it happens.
That said, hopefully 2 good outcomes come of this:
1. CG reads the Q&A questions a bit more closely instead of a brief skim and making assumptions of what is being asked.
2. @CG_SBCrumb @CG_TopHat follow through as promised and update us with the proper answer now that the actual question has been clarified.
