Forum Discussion
9 years ago
"DarthPhelps;830626" wrote:"Grpeephole303;830608" wrote:"Vertigo322;830591" wrote:"Gaidal_Cain;830561" wrote:
Ventress is a complicated woman, lol.
You can say that again. Is her later life story still considered canon? The whole thing with Quinlan Vos and such.
Not if it was written before disney
True, unless/until Disney adopts it (e.g. Thrawn in Rebels). Non-Canon until it isn't :p
Ha ya exactly this, gotta love the EU being just that until Disney needs something new.
"Jay_cube1;830633" wrote:
For Savage it's easy because Maul took him as his apprentice. An argument could be made for Savage as a night sister/brother factions which is plausible.
However, Ventress is a little complicated. We could assume that her training under Dooku and flash back training as a Jedi are just internships to her true identity as a night sister with force abilities.
I think the key here is how long the character is associated with the role and how the role defines him/her. Therefore, Maul and Savage are both Sith whereas Ventress is a night sister with force abilities.
Hmmm I like this way of thinking about it. Another!
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.81,392 PostsLatest Activity: 55 minutes ago
Community Highlights
- CG_Meathead4 months ago
Capital Games Team
- CG_Meathead2 years ago
Capital Games Team
Recent Discussions
- 57 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago
- 2 hours ago
- 3 hours ago