"Roken_Fett;c-1184227" wrote:
"Nikoms565;c-1184037" wrote:
"Roken_Fett;c-1183861" wrote:
There isn't any concept of "I'm doing this because I'm good/bad" for bounty hunters. They are just doing what they do, good or bad, for money. They are above this good vs evil struggle, so to speak.
Lol. Situational ethics, while it attempts to do so, does not actually rise above absolute truth.
Put another way, just because money is neutral, doesn't mean all actions taken to obtain it are.
I agree with the devs - partially because they get to decide, as they control the parameters of the game, but also because their position supports the concept of absolute truth. Which I happen to agree with - and the Star Wars universe has always upheld as well. Despite more recent attempts to muddy the waters.
"actions taken to obtain..."
Exactly what I'm saying. They can take money to do bad things, but they can take money to do good things. So...this is my argument for them being able to fight on both sides. They don't follow good or bad, they follow money. You can say Boba enjoyed killing people, and maybe he did, but you could also pay him to defend and save people from someone bad.
But that doesn't make him a "good" character, just a greedy one.
Boba Fett is a particularly bad example, he spent a significant chunk of his life trying to murder Mace for revenge.
