Buff SEE and LV. 1 omicron should not > a GL

That would still be a failure of testing. If the results of the play test are not passed along to and approved by all the relevant parties, then the testing process as a whole failed.

You're arguing semantics here.

Mephisto is the worst troll i've ever seen online

"Screerider;c-2401154" wrote:

"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2401114" wrote:
That would still be a failure of testing. If the results of the play test are not passed along to and approved by all the relevant parties, then the testing process as a whole failed.

You're arguing semantics here.

Well, not really. I doubt the Testing Team was given a requirement that Omi-Traya shouldn't beat LV, but that non-Omi Traya should continue to be able to beat LV. An Omi shouldn't make a team worse.

Their review could be based on a section of the player base's reaction to the Omi, and someone at EA or CG raising the concern.

I'm not really sure what you're arguing here.

If no changes are made to Traya, then I think your second paragraph is feasible. As an aside, CG should more clearly communicate what they're looking into and why as those details (or lack thereof) could influence player behavior.

If changes are made, then there was a failure at some point in the process--call it testing, QC, interdepartmental communication, whatever--but it would suggest that their system failed in this instance.

Traya is a raid character and in my opinion, FWIW, has been a long way behind the utility of the other two; GK and Han, for a long time.

The Omi (as is) puts her in a better place. It should stay IMO. It's not breaking anything.

Maybe they did test, if all those things are fine?

SK and Scion Boba are certainly easier and faster to get to than Traya and Wampa were in their time so I strongly disagree. On top of that SK as well as Boba have only 1 really strong Omi and 2 which are more like nice to have and dont make them op

"Ravens1113;c-2400757" wrote:

"Screerider;c-2400725" wrote:
Maybe they did test, if all those things are fine?

If they are looking into her interaction with LV, no they didn’t. Her omi is great against debuff heavy teams and they didn’t know how it performed against a debuff heavy GL? Please…..

But you already implied it was ok when you said this:

Traya already soft countered LV prior to the omi.

She beats LV without the Omicron, so why is beating LV with the Omicron an issue?

What point are you contesting?

The notion that Traya beating LV with the Omicron was not properly tested.

True, the fact that CG considers the ease at which Traya now counters LV surprising doesn't necessarily mean they didn't test the omi. It would suggest that they are bad at predicting how their changes will impact the meta.

But I think people are lumping into "testing" CG's inability to predict these meta shifts and interactions in the wild. In part because a handful of active community members on a test server would have found this for free within a couple hours.

Now, if the offense stacking is too high, as some of posited, that would indicate it was not properly tested. But that's a separate issue...