"Riffinator;c-1780459" wrote:
"jkray622;c-1780454" wrote:
"Riffinator;c-1780445" wrote:
"Droideka;c-1780442" wrote:
"Javick_Starage;c-1780440" wrote:
"Riffinator;c-1780433" wrote:
"jkray622;c-1780429" wrote:
"Riffinator;c-1780427" wrote:
"Droideka;c-1780382" wrote:
"Roopehunter;c-1780377" wrote:
No, please.
Theyre standard foot soldiers, brave and loyal, but clearly not able to fight against jedi or sith masters on their own.
Can’t fight against Jedi on their own, yet killed far more Jedi than any other force has?
lmao this, remember order 66?
Order 66 was not "fighting Jedi" - it was shooting them (often in the back) unexpectedly while they were in vulnerable positions. The Jedi were probably emotionally compromised too, as their trusted loyal allies turned on them, leading to distractions.
If those same Jedi had come face to face with the clones in an actual battle, it would have likely been very different.
Pong Krell
That was a great episode! Was he killed by the clones? (After slaughtering like a bunch of them)
Spoiler alert for this CW episode
No, he was stunned by one of them and imprisoned. They were forced to retreat from the planet as the Separatists were pushing them back hard, and one of the clones shot him while he was restrained in his cell. So he was killed by a clone, just not in battle.
He was still captured by clones
Sure, if you can add a Vixus to the Clone Squad.
So because they used tactics and local creatures to capture him it doesn't count? Sure the creature held him down but they still needed to get him over there so it could.
It just shows that enough RNG can allow a whole bunch of clones to capture a Jedi.
There aren't really parallels between true lore and the game in terms of "effectiveness." I was arguing that Clones "killed more Jedi than any other faction" through betrayal, not actual combat - and a single instance of clones capturing or killin one Jedi does not mean that the exception proves the rule.
Clones were effective at what the did, but they weren't Jedi hunters.