CANCEL GAC

"WookieWookie;c-2332074" wrote:

"AlienOverlord;c-2332013" wrote:
It seems impossible for them to make that Zam omi mistake. As soon as someone read the ability, wouldn't they ask whether or not it should have 'other'? People in the forum started asking right away. They either purposefully mislead us or are grossly incompetent.

https://c.tenor.com/odyVsZbC-OYAAAAC/why-not-both-why-not.gif

I'm honestly jaded enough as a F2P who's invested two omis into units (Zam, QGJ) to have either their wording or function changed/nerfed thereafter that I'll likely hold out for 2+ months before slapping an Omi on anyone who looks worth it just to ensure I'm giving the testers (us) enough time to determine if the Omi is 'WAI" in CG's eyes and if there's a nerf. I have to imagine whales who might otherwise be buying the hundred kitten'ing dollar Omi packs are equally hesitant about further investments given CG's track record and refusal to refund QGJ after nerfing him into the ground.

Same. Not applying omis until they're thoroughly tested by the community QA testers and given the green light from the player base.