CGs algorithm fails again
At this point, CGs failure are truly insurmountable. You can't keep up with the failures but can with the successes...which is probably as many as fingers average humans have. So what I mean...is be...
Forum Discussion
"Surgical_dan;c-2457044" wrote:
Even if they were missing their best, and you your worst, they do have an advantage. Not necessarily insurmountable, but a tough fight.
Not sure of your win-loss record, but that can be a factor if you have a string of wins and the algorithm wants to break it for you. Most guilds should average around a 50% win-loss over time anyway, so a single match-up shouldn’t be used to assess overall performance of the match maker.
The other side that’s always missing in these “matchmaker is unfair” threads is the examples where it was stacked in their own favour. Have you got any of these that offset the hard ones?
That's an interesting thought. Here is our record...
