Conquest - Sim for twice the stamina

"Mephisto_style;c-2394914" wrote:
Ask any person on the forums

Proof that this is a bad idea.

"DarjeloSalas;c-2394902" wrote:
If they are a bulldozer, how long does the battle take?

Edit: and what about teams that this team would struggle or outright fail to beat? Can you still sim a Nest team, for example?

This is a solution desperately seeking a problem.

Strongly disagree. Each battle could have a button that upon clicking goes to a new tab in your squads list that is unique for the battle.

Many players want more Sim options in the game. I want it in the grindyest part of then game, surprisingly...

Conquest is great as-is.

If only there were precedent for CG allowing SIM for a long line of roster check battles that also starts with "Galactic" that many people wanted to SIM.

And you are wrong about the implication that many don't want the SIM option I described. Ask any person on the forums that has stated they hate the grind of conquest and I am pretty sure they will love my idea.

As far as your nuance goes about ineffectiveness after low stamina, that's a detail I'd leave for CG to decide. Although I think an increasing RNG check that let's 4 or more battles be a risk of a SIM loss might be a fun option.

"TVF;c-2394918" wrote:

"Mephisto_style;c-2394914" wrote:
Ask any person on the forums

Proof that this is a bad idea.

OK. I can admit that's pretty funny :)

"TVF;c-2394912" wrote:
Conquest is great as-is.

Conquest and Great are not to be used in the same sentence.

"Wolfcast1e;c-2394932" wrote:

"TVF;c-2394912" wrote:
Conquest is great as-is.

Conquest and Great are not to be used in the same sentence.

Ymmv