"DarkDiggler;730930" wrote:
I'm glad they are stopping the exploits, just wish they would be a little more consistent with them. Punishing people (whatever it is for this raid) even though it only lasted a week, while allowing the alt guild hopping and other rancor raid exploits to last so long which definitely benefited players way more to go unpunished doesn't seem to fair.
+1
But why now? Why did you never punished all those guilds that made alt farming/guild hopping? Are you aware that Jose guilds thanks to that exploit got most of their roster fully geared which is one of he factors that allow to finish AAT T6/T7 in a quicker manner??
It sounds terribly suspicious that when X guilds do the exploits you don't punish, but when X guilds don't do the exploit you decide to take actions on the others.
@EA_Jesse
Yes I'm aware there are differences between both situation (roster refresh, more than 50 claiming prizes) but essentially is the same situation: people getting ton of extra gear currency credits shards (Han and Kenobi).
If you are punishing the exploiters of the AAT raid, you should also punish the rancor exploiters.
The current exploit still don't have a week, the previous rancor exploits have been there for months.
More than the difficulty of the raid (my guild couldn't finish heroic), this is the kind of situation that makes some players to feel frustrated on how you take actions against some but others get the laurel leaf.
