Datacron Set-4 Infinite Loop, WAI?!?
Not sure who to tag in this, assuming anyone from CG ever actually reads/responds to genuine concerns, but: Wasn't CG's position always that "infinite loop" scenarios were bad for the game and NOT a ...
Forum Discussion
"Drathuk916;c-2381080" wrote:
The real mistake, imho, is allowing datacrons to be set on defense. They were always going to make an overpowered dc whether intentionally or due to incompetence doesn’t matter. However, had dcs been offensive only than they wouldn’t be as frustrating and dumb. (Editors note: i d i o i t i c gets censored lol)
Everyone hates losing whether it be a war, gac, or a battle within one of the two. Losing because of a ridiculous dc set on defense in either tw or gac is never fun. Losing because your opponent undersized you more because of overpowered datacrons and winning a banner race, while still frustrating, would probably be less annoying.
Totally agree. I'd prefer no datacrons, but if they have to exist, offense-only would be far less frustrating. Also, it makes sense for CG because engagement = $$ and offense is the only engaging aspect of the game.
