Executor is a beast? [MERGE]

"Larx;c-2287872" wrote:

great powerhouse who burns down everyone in offense and CAN be beaten sometimes from older fleets is in my opinion a perfect addition to the current meta.

That's where your argument is flawed imo.
"Burns down everyone on offense ?" True, but people at the top of the meta already did that with their current fleet.
"CAN be beaten" If it was the case, if you had a high chance of failing, that would be fine. But at the moment, it seems that Executor is reliably taken down by old meta (my shard has the same experience that what is said on the forum, i dont just repeat what i've read here); it's not the same as "can be beaten" and the difference is huge;

In Arena, high chance of failing means opponents will rather target other ships who are a sure thing. If you also are a sure thing, it wont benefit you to have unlocked her.
In GAC, a high chance of failing means a high chance of 2 shots the beast and giving the executor's owner an advantage. If your opponent doesn't have a high chance of failing, then you just relic'd meh bounty hunters while your opponent relic'd good teams, effectively giving him an advantage. So you're punished for having improved your roster with what was supposed to be a new meta team.
In TB, you dont need the executor; she's not required and Malevolence/Chimera/Executrix did the job just fine already;
In TW, we'll know today if a wall of Executors can hold the fort.