Forum Discussion
ccmoose
5 years agoSeasoned Ace
"Nauros;c-2287949" wrote:"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2287948" wrote:"slickdealer;c-2287942" wrote:"Beeblebrox;c-2287933" wrote:"HokieFiend;c-2287852" wrote:
A lot of people are slamming their testing or lack thereof but I guarantee you the devs and everyone else are often on unreasonable timeframes to release... for a game that inherently becomes increasingly more complex with every variable (characters, ship, relics, gear etc) that gets added to the game. I'm fine with issues. There always are in any software release I've ever seen at my job..,just some much much smaller in impact. What we all deserve for giving this company a couple billion dollars over the years is for these issues to be prioritized and fixed immediately. "Looking at it for a potential fix in the future" doesn't cut it to me. They need to tell us this is priority one. I don't care if it impacts upcoming releases. Git gud with design, development, testing and probably most importantly forecasting time for a release if that is a huge issue for the company.
They specifically stated that the Executor was planned ever since Piett was confirmed as coming to the game, which means CG have had an entire 12-Months to get this ship right and ensure it was tested prior to announcing its kit to the players. There also doesn't appear to be a specific need to half released it on the date they did as its not a requirement for any event or raid or whatever already in-game, so if they had not sufficiently tested it in that length of time then then surely could've delayed releasing it. I think many players are seeing a trend that CG release items into the game and wildly obvious flaws are identified within a few hours and they're then making hot-fixes or re-releases or nerfs etc when they SHOULD be doing properly diligent pre-announcement testing. As someone who works in software testing personally I have serious doubts and concerns about CG if they are claiming that they do actually properly test to their own standards of satisfaction since its clear that whatever those standards are they aren't acceptably rigorous or aren't being performed by people capable of understanding and doing the kind of testing necessary.
In all likelihood they did test, but tested with a ship we don’t have.
CG gave us one day to figure out they sold us a broken fleet that will be fixed with a $300 marquee.
Imagine if Lord Vader comes out and is terrible without a marquee that comes out later.
LV may very well be the same without Maul.
Didn't they actually say that Maul will be an integral part of LV teams?
I'm not sure. I won't be able to chase LV for a while, so I've kind of just tuned him out.
Featured Places
SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.Latest Activity: 23 days agoCommunity Highlights
- CG_Meathead8 months ago
Capital Games Team