Executor is a beast? [MERGE]

"Stryde;c-2288570" wrote:

"StarSon;c-2288404" wrote:

"IronCross;c-2288403" wrote:

"HokieFiend;c-2288368" wrote:
People aren't going to wait much longer on a more detailed statement with a clear plan on fixing the issues with this ship. People spent 25k crystals 7*'ing it and are using more crystals than before trying to beat lower starred Executors.

People realize it could take a few days to code and run back through testing. "In the future" isn't good enough. People have every right to want their money/crystals back at this point. Communicate exactly what you are doing and the timeframe involved and you'll stop most of that from happening.

Wish I would have known to not upgrade my Executor to 7*. This is just another terrible deployment of the next big thing. Can’t they get just 1 thing right for once without a huge mess…

Instead of not taking mine to 7* (which I didn't realize was going to make it better) I went ahead and removed mods from Piett to slow him down.

I'm a few days behind on the forums, and I do not have the Executor myself, but if your 4* opponents do the same with Piett's mods, are you still in a negative position for having more stars?

There's no reason for mod downgrading on non 7 star Executors as you'll easily have one of your BH ships be faster than Executor. It's a maxed out 7 star Executor and Piett where it's causing problems as the only ship that's able to tie with Executors 192 speed is the IG2000 with a R8 IG88 and then you want to downgrade Pietts mods to make the Executor 1 speed slower (191).

My situation for example:
I have maxed out my 5 star Executor (177 speed). A Xanadu with the R5 Cad and all 6E mods gets to 181 speed so he's alrdy faster than Executor. I then upgraded BAM to R3 so the RC sits at 180 speed, faster than Executor aswell but 1 speed slower than Xanadu. This way I can use Xanadus special on my opponents most important ship and apply breach, call RC as assist for the mark, then use RCs special on the marked opponent and call XB as assist for dmg and potential double tap and breach and then call the mass assist eith Executors first special. That's a lot of momentum.

"SuperSaiyan105;c-2288569" wrote:
Just lost to 4* Executor. All 7* Executor owners in my shard have removed mods from Piett

I had to R8 IG, haven't lost a mirror since.

Like everything else, weak. Sitting at 19 right now in a competitive shard.

Need some proactive concrete changes communicated tonight before the weekend.

From CG? On a Friday?

Good luck with that!

It would be generous of CG to give crystals to all who 7* the ship due to missing out on top daily rewards but we know that isnt happening.

I've been told by opponenets that my 7* Executor fleet is "shockingly easy" to beat, and they're using G11 pilots - if that isn't a clear indication of a failure by @CG_Miller and co then I don't know what is! We've had it made clear to us with the non-GL character nerfs that the "level of investment" is to be of paramount importance in countering something, well that's simply not even close to being true with the counters to the Executor fleet and the cost we had in terms of requirements to get it!

"Beeblebrox;c-2288675" wrote:
I've been told by opponenets that my 7* Executor fleet is "shockingly easy" to beat, and they're using G11 pilots - if that isn't a clear indication of a failure by @CG_Miller and co then I don't know what is! We've had it made clear to us with the non-GL character nerfs that the "level of investment" is to be of paramount importance in countering something, well that's simply not even close to being true with the counters to the Executor fleet and the cost we had in terms of requirements to get it!

I know Executor is not what we expected at 7*, but that would take it to another level. Could you please give more details, like the line up you're using and the one they're using, as well as the gear level of the different pilots ?

"LordDirt;c-2288656" wrote:
Like everything else, weak. Sitting at 19 right now in a competitive shard.

25th now

"Server21;c-2288688" wrote:

"Starslayer;c-2288680" wrote:

"Beeblebrox;c-2288675" wrote:
I've been told by opponenets that my 7* Executor fleet is "shockingly easy" to beat, and they're using G11 pilots - if that isn't a clear indication of a failure by @CG_Miller and co then I don't know what is! We've had it made clear to us with the non-GL character nerfs that the "level of investment" is to be of paramount importance in countering something, well that's simply not even close to being true with the counters to the Executor fleet and the cost we had in terms of requirements to get it!

I know Executor is not what we expected at 7*, but that would take it to another level. Could you please give more details, like the line up you're using and the one they're using, as well as the gear level of the different pilots ?

My Executor is 7 star, all pilots relic’d to at least r5, with 6 dot mods.

I get beaten on auto by a 4 star with a G8 Bando.

It’s a joke.

Mirror line up ?

I hope they realize people simply aren't going to wait in order to start initiating reparations on this. They'd do themselves a huge service by simply issuing a statement today with a bit more detail than "in the future".