Boba Fett doesn't get to use his Seismic Charge when reinforced after contact triggered and the permanent Breach Payout doesn't apply to reinforcements.Either they secretly nerfed it or mine is bugged.Help!

Oh ok. So they nerfed it then. Cheers

"CrispyFett;c-2433492" wrote:This is WAI. They "fixed" this bug prior to Levi's release. I'm assuming it was a mirror match vs another Exec? If opponent exec reinforces after your contract hits, their reinforcement wont be breached, and if you then call Boba, he won't have his charge cooldown reset It is at least still partly bugged, as RIs after executor gets its contract still get the TL lock. This was a mirror with me literally just now. Their IG was a reinforcement after Exe had its contract for a few turns. At this point I just want them to decide how they want it to work and to apply it consistently. Either they should have TL and breach or neither. Please, CG, for the love of all that is holy, pick a lane!

"englishste;c-2433500" wrote:Oh ok. So they nerfed it then. CheersNo, a bug fix to bring actual function in line with wording, according to CG.It’s been pretty consistent that existing bugs that benefited the meta cap ships have been fixed only when a new level was added.Or at least it has happened now with exe and prior with Neg. Also did some vulture droid shenanigans with Mal which iirc made beating exec harder.Actually this also means it’s quite consistent overall, there’s a cadence ;)

Except the wording clearly states it’s supposed to apply BOTH breach immunity AND target lock immunity (aka chaff). The change now only stop the locked breach after contract, but still allows target lock. If what you and others are stating is true, it should apply to both, but very clearly it’s a nerf to slow down the ult, which is why it’s only affecting breach.They need to change this back to the previous functionality. It’s not like it’ll make Executor that much better against Leviathan anyway."inphinitfx;c-2433555" wrote:"Notthatguyfrombefore;c-2433511" wrote:It is at least still partly bugged, as RIs after executor gets its contract still get the TL lock. This was a mirror with me literally just now. Their IG was a reinforcement after Exe had its contract for a few turns. At this point I just want them to decide how they want it to work and to apply it consistently. Either they should have TL and breach or neither. Please, CG, for the love of all that is holy, pick a lane!No, because the fix was specifically for the Breach Immunity that Exe is meant to apply to it's reinforcements, which prevents Breach but not Target Lock. It's long (maybe always?) had the wording in it's ability, it just never prevented the permanent breach applied by the other exe before.

Regardless, if it has been bugged for a year plus, they should have just edited the text to how it was working. Muscle mirror has been built, this old dog probably won’t learn a new trick.

EXECUTOR NERF!? | EA Forums

12 Replies

Replies have been turned off for this discussion

NotRealUltra
Seasoned Newcomer
2 years ago
Submit a bug report to https://answers.ea.com/t5/Bug-Reports/bd-p/star-wars-galaxy-of-heroes-bug-report-en
Crispy508
Seasoned Adventurer
2 years ago
This is WAI. They "fixed" this bug prior to Levi's release. I'm assuming it was a mirror match vs another Exec? If opponent exec reinforces after your contract hits, their reinforcement wont be breached, and if you then call Boba, he won't have his charge cooldown reset
englishste82
2 years ago
Oh ok. So they nerfed it then. Cheers
notthatguybefor
2 years ago
"CrispyFett;c-2433492" wrote:
This is WAI. They "fixed" this bug prior to Levi's release. I'm assuming it was a mirror match vs another Exec? If opponent exec reinforces after your contract hits, their reinforcement wont be breached, and if you then call Boba, he won't have his charge cooldown reset

It is at least still partly bugged, as RIs after executor gets its contract still get the TL lock.
This was a mirror with me literally just now. Their IG was a reinforcement after Exe had its contract for a few turns. At this point I just want them to decide how they want it to work and to apply it consistently. Either they should have TL and breach or neither. Please, CG, for the love of all that is holy, pick a lane!
Morgoth_swgoh
Seasoned Rookie
2 years ago
"englishste;c-2433500" wrote:
Oh ok. So they nerfed it then. Cheers

No, a bug fix to bring actual function in line with wording, according to CG.
It’s been pretty consistent that existing bugs that benefited the meta cap ships have been fixed only when a new level was added.
Or at least it has happened now with exe and prior with Neg. Also did some vulture droid shenanigans with Mal which iirc made beating exec harder.

Actually this also means it’s quite consistent overall, there’s a cadence ;)
Inphinitfx
2 years ago
"Notthatguyfrombefore;c-2433511" wrote:

It is at least still partly bugged, as RIs after executor gets its contract still get the TL lock.
This was a mirror with me literally just now. Their IG was a reinforcement after Exe had its contract for a few turns. At this point I just want them to decide how they want it to work and to apply it consistently. Either they should have TL and breach or neither. Please, CG, for the love of all that is holy, pick a lane!

No, because the fix was specifically for the Breach Immunity that Exe is meant to apply to it's reinforcements, which prevents Breach but not Target Lock. It's long (maybe always?) had the wording in it's ability, it just never prevented the permanent breach applied by the other exe before.
KDC99-X
Rising Rookie
2 years ago
Except the wording clearly states it’s supposed to apply BOTH breach immunity AND target lock immunity (aka chaff). The change now only stop the locked breach after contract, but still allows target lock. If what you and others are stating is true, it should apply to both, but very clearly it’s a nerf to slow down the ult, which is why it’s only affecting breach.

They need to change this back to the previous functionality. It’s not like it’ll make Executor that much better against Leviathan anyway.

"inphinitfx;c-2433555" wrote:
"Notthatguyfrombefore;c-2433511" wrote:

It is at least still partly bugged, as RIs after executor gets its contract still get the TL lock.
This was a mirror with me literally just now. Their IG was a reinforcement after Exe had its contract for a few turns. At this point I just want them to decide how they want it to work and to apply it consistently. Either they should have TL and breach or neither. Please, CG, for the love of all that is holy, pick a lane!

No, because the fix was specifically for the Breach Immunity that Exe is meant to apply to it's reinforcements, which prevents Breach but not Target Lock. It's long (maybe always?) had the wording in it's ability, it just never prevented the permanent breach applied by the other exe before.
KDC99-X
Rising Rookie
2 years ago
Also, breach is not always applying properly even to the units on the field. I had it happen to me today in a mirror, and there’s other reports of it on Answers HQ.
KDC99-X
Rising Rookie
2 years ago
The 7th post down: https://answers.ea.com/t5/Bug-Reports/Executor-not-applying-breach-properly/m-p/12762857/highlight/true#M66745

Happened to me today in a mirror: enemy IG was already on the field when I triggered my contract, but didn’t get the locked breach.
Range1974
Seasoned Traveler
2 years ago
Regardless, if it has been bugged for a year plus, they should have just edited the text to how it was working. Muscle mirror has been built, this old dog probably won’t learn a new trick.