February speculation (MERGE)

"Monel;c-1430371" wrote:

"ChickenFett139;c-1429454" wrote:

"Monel;c-1429364" wrote:

Also, Leias last name was Organs. While she may have Skywalker her dead beat dad was never around and she was adopted. So in turn Ben has never been a Skywalker.

Your argument makes no sense. You can’t change your base DNA just because you are adopted. Luke and Leia have Anakin and Padme’s DNA. Luke was raised by Owen and Bearu, it dose not make him a Lars anymore than Leia is an Organa. They each adopted the beliefs and values of those that raised them, but it does not lessen the Force powers they possess or could pass on to their children. Snoke says he chose Ben specifically to be the next Vader.

Good luck in biology.

I never said DNA was changed. Just said she never had the name Skywalker. So yeah, nice try pal :) If she never had the name then Ben never would have had the name. No matter how you slice it, the Skywalker saga has ended. Unless the screen writer changes things up some way.

Luke was always a Skywalker, one of the many script errors with Star Wars. Hey let's hide the kid on the planet where his dad was from. Oh by the way, let's give him to his relatives and he can keep his birthright name.

Anyway... my sister has kids and while they are of the same blood as me they we have different last names. Let's say my last name is Smith and hers is Jones. Her kids are blood but will never be Smith's. So if all the Smiths of my family die the Smith saga ends.

It's just the way it works.

Sorry pal but you are talking legacy names not bloodlines. Star Wars 1-9 are all about the Skywalker family tree. Luke and Leia were born Skywalkers. Padme Skywalker was their mom. Kylo Ren is the rightful heir to his grandpa Darth Vader’s legacy.

Don’t like it, here is Kathleen Kennedy’s fan mail address. You can argue with her about bloodlines and legacy.

Kathleen Kennedy
United Talent Agency
9336 Civic Center Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210-3604
USA