"niko4;c-2256500" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2256493" wrote:
It is irrelevant, as the original split was due to population and no other factors, so who is in your shard is irrelevant to this discussion, which invlueldes thier GP, guild and anything else.
And that's part of the problem. Our active population, not the total population, is not comparable to others. What else would you like to look at? Has anyone quit the game in your shard? How fast do they drop and how far?
But how do you know that, it is very difficult to get any relevant data of that kind past the top 50. Yes you have done a lot to make note of that for your shard, but that doesnt help paint the picture of other shards.
I understand you may feel that way, but you have no proof beyond what you know of your shard.
I have spoken to people who have and stepped back myself for a bit. I could easily reach out and discuss the same details for the top 100 or more for my shard, I know there are over 150 active players at a bare minimum from someone who shares my hour dropping to almost 200 at one point.
Who quit is irrelevant.
How far someone falls can be misleading. I can drop by 5 attacks and not leave the top 30, but someone at 30 falling from 5 attacks would fall much further "in comparison" because the jumps get bigger. Points like this can actually be relevant, but more likely to show that your "2nd group" is not falling as far as you think, unless you are very careful about how you portray this data.
