GA is a forgone conclusion
The matchmaking in GA really needs improving if we are going to have closer and more interesting match-ups. Currently it’s usually the case that I can tell immediately whether or not I’m going to ...
Forum Discussion
"BubbaFett;c-1777710" wrote:"Javick_Starage;c-1777692" wrote:"BubbaFett;c-1777686" wrote:
GA is a combination of all of those things..... Analyzing your roster vs your opponents roster, trying to think of where he will place his team's, developing a solid defence while ensuring you have good offense to use etc.....
I would disagree with you. If you look at the rosters in my original example it doesn’t really matter where you place teams or what you do. One roster is never going to beat the other.
I agree with you that there are some extreme examples like that.... It's going to happen, it's just part of the game.... There are also some really tough nailbiters as well..... I won my last GA by 6 points.... We were so evenly matched that it came down to who had the cleanest one shot wins..... Sure, you will sometimes get drawn against a guy that made some really poor roster choices, but the cream always rises to the top by the end of the GA.....
I think your latter example is what I’d like to see more of.
My qualm is the matchmaking currently seems to produce a lot more predictable matches than close. I’d prefer a change so we can have closer matches more often.
