GA is a forgone conclusion
The matchmaking in GA really needs improving if we are going to have closer and more interesting match-ups. Currently it’s usually the case that I can tell immediately whether or not I’m going to ...
Forum Discussion
"Liath;c-1778114" wrote:"Gifafi;c-1778000" wrote:"Holy_warrior;c-1777655" wrote:
This is your own fault unfortunately.
Been playing for years. Only ever focused on 1 character at a time. I have 1.5 mill gp and i have 5 solid teams 80k+
The search is perfect, i only ever match with playes at my gp and because i was smart, i now rule my GA every time. Suck it up. Focus on your teams rather than ranking up every character in your roster and learn to win.
what you are missing is that no one knew to not level up any toons that aren't meta, unless you started after GA was announced. Before that, we were rewarded for leveling and gearing toons, even CUP I guess, for GP. But even if you never leveled bad toons, you would still have a bunch at a higher than ideal (for GA) level.
The point is why reward us for having a higher gp, then punish us for having a higher gp? What makes the most sense is to have matchups based on # of zetas, G12's etc. That way is someone has a maxed zetaed CWC that's on them, but it doesn't punish people who have been playing for years when the incentives were different.
People would still be making the exact same argument. "Why should I be punished for putting a zeta on QGJ/Cody/insert any other character that used to be relevant and no longer is?"
but it would make much less sense. zetas are extremely rare, and G12 is also very hard to attain. if the matchups were based off stats like those it would be more fair. Like I said if you have a g12+5 zetaed CWC that's on you. That's a lot different than being punished for playing the game they told us to play for years and then they intro this new thing that says "oops, shouldn't have done what we said."
I mean, GA rewards are garbage especially for the timesuck, but more fair> less fair
