"Justokay;c-2458555" wrote:
Stop. You’re saying knowing you can’t drop a battle or that you can drop 3 battles on a back wall isn’t an advantage? These aren’t serious arguments. This is called a motte and bailey argument. Next you’ll demand stats that nobody has and claim a win.
How is it an advantage if it doesn't alter the outcome? Knowing you can't drop a battle doesn't mean you have a greater chance of not dropping a battle. And knowing you can't overcome the score and only have to do one attack can only change a possible win to a definite loss, which would be an advantage
for the player attacking first.
An informed decision is not necessarily an advantage in the outcome.