GAC draw results unfair for lower GP
Defaulting the victory to the higher GP in the result of a draw is completely unfair. If anything, the fact that the lower GP can achieve the same score with less potential resources shows that t...
Forum Discussion
"GegeGerard24;c-2411090" wrote:"DarjeloSalas;c-2411083" wrote:
So you're suggesting that people who don't engage with GAC for a while, or just plain suck at it should be banned?
Now I've heard everything.
I thought you could read...
I had clearly said this and you quoted it."GegeGerard24;c-2411081" wrote:
By unfair advantage, i am talking about their manipulation of skill rating. They intentionally lower their skill rating so that they can achieve whatever goal they have.
Than ofcourse, an player who has taken an hiatus from GAC has to be identified in ban investigation.
They have the datas whether a player intentionally lower their skill rating or not.
Tha fact is, by doing that, they put other in disadvantage (75% losing probability)
How do you prove someone intentionally lowered their skill rating? I mean, it's easy to say "... has to be identified in ban investigation", but what do you think CG should/can/will do when somebody says "well my brother borrowed my phone so I couldn't play last GAC", ask them to send a picture of their brother holding up today's paper and their phone?
