"darthjj_G1A;c-2026901" wrote:
@Cyricus well mate, you might be in the bracket, where people use only standard teams to battle each other and you can find most counters on youtube, but lot’s of people have to play every round under quite different conditions, your post says for you that you are an amateur here)
Nonsense. If you believe this game to be rocket science then ... well, no, it is not. In fact your post shows that you didn't even actually check out that battle log on swgoh so far regarding the information it offers. It is totally useless in its current form.
Why?
a) Only shows the actual winning team (even if it took you 2 or 3 tries to win, so the first team is missing)
b) There is no info regarding mods or stats
c) There is better information available on the net
d) Hell, even checking out your opponent in game and apply some logical deducing provides more info that swgoh battle logs ("Oh, no Geos in first rows? Must be logical you can find it in the last row then on defence, right?)
e) If you shuffle your setup (front/back offence/defense) a history log won't help
It doesn't even identify cheaters because of a) and missing raw data (meaning damage per round for example).
But please feel free to enlighten me on WHY it is such a bad thing to have (seriously). Because, well, your initial post lacks an actual argument and shows only your personal opinion.