GAC "Matchmaking"

Lower your skill rating

What Division are you in? What's your recent Win-Loss record?

Some people don't like 3v3 so it's likely they haven't participated and fell.

Has anyone else noticed that this is just humble bragging. Like, “Woe is me! Im so good at GAC that I get matched up with people with nearly double my GP. What fortunes have befallen me to have climbed to such a high division. If only I wasn’t so good at GAC I would still be in a lower division being matched against similar sized accounts!”

"Notthatguyfrombefore;c-2411221" wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that this is just humble bragging. Like, “Woe is me! Im so good at GAC that I get matched up with people with nearly double my GP. What fortunes have befallen me to have climbed to such a high division. If only I wasn’t so good at GAC I would still be in a lower division being matched against similar sized accounts!”

i dont think thats the case.. im just asking for a similar GP opponents lol and not 2x my gp
this now exactly show that GAC is not skill based if we ignore Kyber i guess

"SlipperyPete;c-2411204" wrote:
What Division are you in? What's your recent Win-Loss record?

Some people don't like 3v3 so it's likely they haven't participated and fell.

Chromium 2 .. and im not sure if Win-Loss record matter ? last 5v5 its 5/4 and i nthe current 3v3 so far is 4/2
80% of the times im vs 6M+ accounts...

"scuba;c-2411203" wrote:
Lower your skill rating

incorrect solution imo

"DarjeloSalas;c-2411229" wrote:
Yet you are winning 60% of your matches…

just because i have 2 solid teams to hold...
its not about the winning or loosing.. its about that when i use my 3-4 good teams on attack im stuck vs the 8M accounts cus their deff is full Reliced while mine is g10 beside 2 good teams

"DarjeloSalas;c-2411232" wrote:

"tohn;c-2411230" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2411229" wrote:
Yet you are winning 60% of your matches…

just because i have 2 solid teams to hold...
its not about the winning or loosing.. its about that when i use my 3-4 good teams on attack im stuck vs the 8M accounts cus their deff is full Reliced while mine is g10 beside 2 good teams

Except… for the devs it absolutely is about winning or losing. The whole stated intention is for players to settle at a 50% win rate.

I completely accept that matchups might not be fun, but for pretty much every forumer complaining about matchups, they are experiencing exactly what the devs have intended.

only asking for equal opponents or atlest kind of. Cus now if this guy attack.. he simply win and i dont think that fair
is it so hard for CG to limit the GAC bracket to some flat range or % ..
50/50 winrate is perfectly fine
the few times i was vs slightly lower GP than me i actually lost most of them :smiley:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2411234" wrote:

"tohn;c-2411233" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2411232" wrote:

"tohn;c-2411230" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2411229" wrote:
Yet you are winning 60% of your matches…

just because i have 2 solid teams to hold...
its not about the winning or loosing.. its about that when i use my 3-4 good teams on attack im stuck vs the 8M accounts cus their deff is full Reliced while mine is g10 beside 2 good teams

Except… for the devs it absolutely is about winning or losing. The whole stated intention is for players to settle at a 50% win rate.

I completely accept that matchups might not be fun, but for pretty much every forumer complaining about matchups, they are experiencing exactly what the devs have intended.

only asking for equal opponents or atlest kind of. Cus now if this guy attack.. he simply win and i dont think that fair
is it so hard for CG to limit the GAC bracket to some flat range or % ..
50/50 winrate is perfectly fine
the few times i was vs slightly lower GP than me i actually lost most of them :smiley:

The problems are that:
- CG screwed up when they called it “skill rating”. It’s more a rating of your engagement, than anything else.
- CG also screwed up when they designed the Skill Rating system. They made it far too easy for someone with a massive GP to fall quickly and face a good player with much smaller GP.

I think they should completely reset GAC at the end of this season, and redesign (and rename) the whole skill rating system. It should be designed so that non-engaging accounts who start life in Kyber 3 take literally MONTHS to drop enough skill rating to reach the levels where they are facing 1.5M GP accounts.

They should give everyone back the GP-influenced initial skill rating, then multiply it by 2.5 or 3, then reduce the skill rating change by half, then go again and see where we end up.

sound like a plan!
lets go

Don't worry...

I (1.8M) was against 6M <<< 3 times higher, yours is only 2 times higher, and a PhD Astrophysicist said that i should have had 90% chance of winning against him, given that he had dropped so far from Aurodium to Carbonite.

=====

The chance of winning to such higher GP is above 50%.

===Screenshot===

===============

Later, he confirmed that this "above 50%" was actually 90%. Given that the higher GP had dropped that far, from Aurodium to Carbinite (this is the important part)...that is to say, the lower a higher GP drops, the higher chance of you to win against him...

===Screenshot===

===============

So, the next time i met 10M opponent who had dropped from Kyber to Carbonite, i should have close to 100% of winning against him.

=====

So, don't you worry, you've got this battle!