GAC "Matchmaking"

"DarjeloSalas;c-2411234" wrote:

"tohn;c-2411233" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2411232" wrote:

"tohn;c-2411230" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2411229" wrote:
Yet you are winning 60% of your matches…

just because i have 2 solid teams to hold...
its not about the winning or loosing.. its about that when i use my 3-4 good teams on attack im stuck vs the 8M accounts cus their deff is full Reliced while mine is g10 beside 2 good teams

Except… for the devs it absolutely is about winning or losing. The whole stated intention is for players to settle at a 50% win rate.

I completely accept that matchups might not be fun, but for pretty much every forumer complaining about matchups, they are experiencing exactly what the devs have intended.

only asking for equal opponents or atlest kind of. Cus now if this guy attack.. he simply win and i dont think that fair
is it so hard for CG to limit the GAC bracket to some flat range or % ..
50/50 winrate is perfectly fine
the few times i was vs slightly lower GP than me i actually lost most of them :smiley:

The problems are that:
- CG screwed up when they called it “skill rating”. It’s more a rating of your engagement, than anything else.
- CG also screwed up when they designed the Skill Rating system. They made it far too easy for someone with a massive GP to fall quickly and face a good player with much smaller GP.

I think they should completely reset GAC at the end of this season, and redesign (and rename) the whole skill rating system. It should be designed so that non-engaging accounts who start life in Kyber 3 take literally MONTHS to drop enough skill rating to reach the levels where they are facing 1.5M GP accounts.

They should give everyone back the GP-influenced initial skill rating, then multiply it by 2.5 or 3, then reduce the skill rating change by half, then go again and see where we end up.