GAC "Matchmaking"
when im at 4.2M GP why i have to face 8M accounts?? what am i supposed to do.. how can i win?? its getting ridiculous.
Forum Discussion
"el_mago;c-2412361" wrote:"BubbaFett;c-2412286" wrote:"scuba;c-2412284" wrote:"BubbaFett;c-2412282" wrote:"scuba;c-2412281" wrote:
Make GAC more enjoyable and the big rosters might actually participate and not fall to the scrub ranks ;) . Problem solved.
What about GAC isn't enjoyable?.... I typically respect your opinion, but it's literally a straightforward roster VS. roster battle... If your roster and skills are better you should win... What could be simpler?
I hate platoons, defense is just platoons, units you dump resources into and don't use.
I am also not a PvP person, never really liked it.
I just really don't enjoy TW or GAC.
I don't really have an idea to make it more enjoyable, but I just don't like the format.
There are reasons I am sure these big accounts are not doing GAC and just dropping, my guess would be probably be something to do with the enjoyment factor.
I get others really like these game modes. They are also a necessary evil (for me) so I do TW and some what do GAC.
Platoons in GAC? Wrong game mode man....
Some big rosters drop in GAC because they can whale for the rewards so they dont care.Some drop because they don't enjoy the game mode (will give you that, not a huge TW fan myselfso I don't enjoy all modes either)....
That being said, the lower roster dudes should be happy they get as high as they do because the big roster guys drop...
If it weren't for that, and if everyone was using their rosters to the full potential and being super competitive then these low roster guys would be nowehere near where they are...
They should be happy and stop looking a gift horse in the mouth rather than whining about the few super high roster guys that actually beat them in a round...
Two things:
1. When scuba said "platoons", he meant (and correct me if I'm wrong Scuba) that setting Defense in GAC is like setting Platoons in TB. You gotta read that again, Bubba, and understand what he means.
2. It's not about the rewards for these folks. You keep saying that they should be happy with the rewards and they shouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth....and you're right about the REWARDS; but what you are missing is that THEY ARE NOT HAVING FUN. That is the point most are trying to make. You are substituting Rewards for Fun.
I'm sure they love the rewards, I do too when my opponents don't attack. Is it as fun? No, it is not.
Just take a moment to look at it from THEIR point of view, not yours. I'm not attacking you personally, so please don't take it that way. I'm hopefully capturing the spirit of their argument about the fun side.
The issue is that in order to create a viable system which enables them to have fun that will inevitably be balanced in a way which means they receive less in rewards. If that’s what such players want then that’s fine, but they need to understand that that’s the trade-off.
