GAC system maybe ?

"DeusArt;c-2394149" wrote:

Time matters. We play with this system only for a year. And GP start give effect only on first 2 seasons. Then I never faced lower GP opponents. Bur your GP is also a factor, and it will work for you once a year - that is fair, it’s not like previous system when you locked in you GP bucket and nothing more. You locked only for a 1 season of 12. Other 11 season is game with current rules.

"harvestmouse;c-2394147" wrote:

It also doesn't take into account, or punishes unfairly the try hards that have moved up the rankings with a lower GP and are happy about it. Do they want to be reset to lower leagues and get less rewards?

It will count them with yearly based reward(idk, 10k crystals for example if it’s a year activity, but balance it in ligue-division range). Otherwise what we receive at the end in current system? 50/50 winrate, that’s all. It’s boring, and I will be glad to see competitive in GAC, where I could hit a row of victories, but I can’t because of GP/roster wall. With my current roster in 4m GP I’m facing only 7-8m GP in aurodium, if lucky 6m GP.
Would I like to be reseted in chromium with receiving, idk 6-7k crystals?
Yes, there is:

a reward for year activity

better start because of rising GP for this year(chromium, not bronzium like it was year ago)

chance to play with victories which is most important part

stimulation of my activity for next year and reason to grow my GP for better start

"DeusArt;c-2394149" wrote:

Time matters. We play with this system only for a year. And GP start give effect only on first 2 seasons. Then I never faced lower GP opponents. Bur your GP is also a factor, and it will work for you once a year - that is fair, it’s not like previous system when you locked in you GP bucket and nothing more. You locked only for a 1 season of 12. Other 11 season is game with current rules.

So we fundamentally disagree on 2 issues.

1. The affect resetting by GP would have. I'm absolutely positive it wouldn't just affect 2 seasons of GAC. It would affect half a year at the least. Even if you're right, it affected only one season..........what is the point then? It seems a pointless exercise.

I prefer the current system where we're matched by success. However, I really don't mind being matched in GAC by GP. My big issue with matching by GP is the affect it has on every other part of SWGOH. Either your system has an effect, in which case players go back to min-max building or it doesn't, in which case it's pointless. You're trying to sell the idea as both (in a positive sense), I believe there has to be a draw back. I believe it's the old drawback of the old system.

The old system wasn't just a GP bucket and nothing more. There were 4 weeks, each week's draw was based on how well you were doing over the season. So the first week was totally GP based, after that it depended on your success in the previous weeks (but still within GP brackets). Your system is pretty much the same, but on a larger scale.

"DeusArt;c-2394149" wrote:

Otherwise what we receive at the end in current system? 50/50 winrate, that’s all. It’s boring, and I will be glad to see competitive in GAC, where I could hit a row of victories, but I can’t because of GP/roster wall. With my current roster in 4m GP I’m facing only 7-8m GP in aurodium, if lucky 6m GP.

So, you think it's unfair that we don't have even GP? However, you think it's fair to go on large winning streaks? I feel that most of the arguments for this system are (like you) lower GP players that feel they are being handed unfair matches because of GP, therefore they should be winning more. This isn't taken into account your 'Yang' to your 'Ying'. The 8 million GP guy who will go on large losing streaks.

I started in Aurodium 3 and I'm now at 6.8 million, so I would say that's around the average for Aurodium (not taking into account Kyber shrinking). So at 4 million, you're already way above where you were set under GP. you don't think you should expect biased matches to offset your obvious skill? You think it's ok under your system to start off with a nigh on 100% win streak that will tail off to 50% as the year progresses, and then reset again?

Sorry, I cannot agree on fairness or what's best for the game as a whole. The GP issue affects much more than just GAC. I think your situation is more than fair, and how the system should be working.

I also feel your theory effects are a bit of a contradiction.