GAC system maybe ?
Why not match people with the same GP for an example if you are between 2 to 3 mill GP u get matched with that GP instead of unfair playing field with the current system Just a thought
Forum Discussion
"harvestmouse;c-2394154" wrote:
I prefer the current system where we're matched by success. However, I really don't mind being matched in GAC by GP. My big issue with matching by GP is the affect it has on every other part of SWGOH. Either your system has an effect, in which case players go back to min-max building or it doesn't, in which case it's pointless. You're trying to sell the idea as both (in a positive sense), I believe there has to be a draw back. I believe it's the old drawback of the old system.
Current system has dead end, it sort player by success and give them 50/50 winrate. That's all. Only Kyber 1 has real competitive GAC.
When you start with GP - that's GP game, when you win/lose it will lead you to success based system with each new season and stops on 50/50 again.
Then refresh gives you new start:
For huge GP, uneffective rosters - betters league rewards from start and easy challenge on late game with low GP opponents
For low GP, effective rosters - better winrate rewards from start and hard challenge on late game with Big GP opponents.
Just attach to this really good reward at the end of GAC year and it will give huge stimulation to play all year.
"harvestmouse;c-2394154" wrote:
So, you think it's unfair that we don't have even GP? However, you think it's fair to go on large winning streaks? I feel that most of the arguments for this system are (like you) lower GP players that feel they are being handed unfair matches because of GP, therefore they should be winning more. This isn't taken into account your 'Yang' to your 'Ying'. The 8 million GP guy who will go on large losing streaks.
What do you mean? I should be punished for good winrate?
I'm not interested on those who is easy win for me or those who is unbeatable for me. I want someone who is competitive for me.
