Galactic Chase: Malevolence v Negotiator

Or...let the players choose when it starts...

or let the players know when it starts?

"Shnel;c-2300455" wrote:
Or...let the players choose when it starts...

Having the choice of which capital ship shards you want would be amazing, although I’m not sure how CG could pull that off.

I wonder why they wouldn’t offer to do back-to-back galactic chase events with each ship?

"DoctorDan;d-249611" wrote:
If the survey results were so evenly split, why can’t we offer both Malevolence and Negotiator shards for next galactic chase?

Last i checked, one side had more votes than the other

"Ultra;c-2300510" wrote:

"DoctorDan;d-249611" wrote:
If the survey results were so evenly split, why can’t we offer both Malevolence and Negotiator shards for next galactic chase?

Last i checked, one side had more votes than the other

Right…50.6% to 49.4%? Not exactly an overwhelming majority now than is it.

"DoctorDan;c-2300555" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2300510" wrote:

"DoctorDan;d-249611" wrote:
If the survey results were so evenly split, why can’t we offer both Malevolence and Negotiator shards for next galactic chase?

Last i checked, one side had more votes than the other

Right…50.6% to 49.4%? Not exactly an overwhelming majority now than is it.

It’s not and that’s how polls / voting are (just need 1 vote more than others)

Maybe next time we have a close election in the United States we can have two presidents!

"Ultra;c-2300556" wrote:

"DoctorDan;c-2300555" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2300510" wrote:

"DoctorDan;d-249611" wrote:
If the survey results were so evenly split, why can’t we offer both Malevolence and Negotiator shards for next galactic chase?

Last i checked, one side had more votes than the other

Right…50.6% to 49.4%? Not exactly an overwhelming majority now than is it.

It’s not and that’s how polls / voting are (just need 1 vote more than others)

Maybe next time we have a close election in the United States we can have two presidents!

I think you have to ask yourself why we had a poll in the first place? If the intent of the poll was to create content that would make players happy/increase enjoyment in the game, then the poll results are pretty clear:

If only one capital ship is chosen, half of the users will be disappointed - that’s a lot.

Fortunately, this isn’t an “election” where a single winner is chosen. CG can easily offer both ships either in a subsequent galactic chase or simultaneously by offering different shards on different nodes.

Last time I checked, we didn’t have an “election” to choose our favorite Geo for this current chase, or did I miss that?

"DoctorDan;c-2300565" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2300556" wrote:

"DoctorDan;c-2300555" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2300510" wrote:

"DoctorDan;d-249611" wrote:
If the survey results were so evenly split, why can’t we offer both Malevolence and Negotiator shards for next galactic chase?

Last i checked, one side had more votes than the other

Right…50.6% to 49.4%? Not exactly an overwhelming majority now than is it.

It’s not and that’s how polls / voting are (just need 1 vote more than others)

Maybe next time we have a close election in the United States we can have two presidents!

I think you have to ask yourself why we had a poll in the first place? If the intent of the poll was to create content that would make players happy/increase enjoyment in the game, then the poll results are pretty clear:

If only one capital ship is chosen, half of the users will be disappointed - that’s a lot.

Fortunately, this isn’t an “election” where a single winner is chosen. CG can easily offer both ships either in a subsequent galactic chase or simultaneously by offering different shards on different nodes.

Last time I checked, we didn’t have an “election” to choose our favorite Geo for this current chase, or did I miss that?

LOL you are reading way too much into it. It's a new thing they're doing, and they were going for some community engagement. They weren't saying they needed an overwhelmingly majority or any such thing, and there is no tech to allow players to choose which in game.

Accept the shard shop currency and move on.

"StarSon;c-2300566" wrote:

"DoctorDan;c-2300565" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2300556" wrote:

"DoctorDan;c-2300555" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2300510" wrote:

"DoctorDan;d-249611" wrote:
If the survey results were so evenly split, why can’t we offer both Malevolence and Negotiator shards for next galactic chase?

Last i checked, one side had more votes than the other

Right…50.6% to 49.4%? Not exactly an overwhelming majority now than is it.

It’s not and that’s how polls / voting are (just need 1 vote more than others)

Maybe next time we have a close election in the United States we can have two presidents!

I think you have to ask yourself why we had a poll in the first place? If the intent of the poll was to create content that would make players happy/increase enjoyment in the game, then the poll results are pretty clear:

If only one capital ship is chosen, half of the users will be disappointed - that’s a lot.

Fortunately, this isn’t an “election” where a single winner is chosen. CG can easily offer both ships either in a subsequent galactic chase or simultaneously by offering different shards on different nodes.

Last time I checked, we didn’t have an “election” to choose our favorite Geo for this current chase, or did I miss that?

LOL you are reading way too much into it. It's a new thing they're doing, and they were going for some community engagement. They weren't saying they needed an overwhelmingly majority or any such thing, and there is no tech to allow players to choose which in game.

Accept the shard shop currency and move on.

Ok that’s fair, so help me understand then. If the goal is community engagement, then why not do sequential chase events? I figured they simply wanted to know what was in demand?

"DoctorDan;c-2300568" wrote:

"StarSon;c-2300566" wrote:

"DoctorDan;c-2300565" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2300556" wrote:

"DoctorDan;c-2300555" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2300510" wrote:

"DoctorDan;d-249611" wrote:
If the survey results were so evenly split, why can’t we offer both Malevolence and Negotiator shards for next galactic chase?

Last i checked, one side had more votes than the other

Right…50.6% to 49.4%? Not exactly an overwhelming majority now than is it.

It’s not and that’s how polls / voting are (just need 1 vote more than others)

Maybe next time we have a close election in the United States we can have two presidents!

I think you have to ask yourself why we had a poll in the first place? If the intent of the poll was to create content that would make players happy/increase enjoyment in the game, then the poll results are pretty clear:

If only one capital ship is chosen, half of the users will be disappointed - that’s a lot.

Fortunately, this isn’t an “election” where a single winner is chosen. CG can easily offer both ships either in a subsequent galactic chase or simultaneously by offering different shards on different nodes.

Last time I checked, we didn’t have an “election” to choose our favorite Geo for this current chase, or did I miss that?

LOL you are reading way too much into it. It's a new thing they're doing, and they were going for some community engagement. They weren't saying they needed an overwhelmingly majority or any such thing, and there is no tech to allow players to choose which in game.

Accept the shard shop currency and move on.

Ok that’s fair, so help me understand then. If the goal is community engagement, then why not do sequential chase events? I figured they simply wanted to know what was in demand?

Maybe they will. All they have said is they are doing these monthly, and they wanted to use a poll to pick the next one. We have no idea how they'll pick November's.