Dear EA,could you please do something about the galactic war opponent selection to let me fight people that spent less than 1000 dollars on the game? It is getting pretty boring/annoying, I have to fight my way through compulsive shoppers every day and they surely have some 1 million galactic power more than me. I'm sure that if I would spend 1000 on the game I would meet only people who spent 5000 and so on. EA, could you please not? Hire another marketing manager to better handle the "forcing you to shop" side of the game please, the things you recently did to call for money are pretty low (cpt. Han solo, the tb in general and so on).

"DatBoi;c-1265045" wrote:"Drazhar;c-1265042" wrote:Well, how can I put that. I'm not complaining about people spending money. There's people which spend whole salaries every month in the game, so whatever, I will not because I have a life and more important thing to pay. Not so much of a problem. The problem occurs when the game forces you to deal with very high grade shoppers to proceed in the game, thing that you cannot do while being a ftp unless you played since day 1. That's what I'm pointing out: the pay to play philosophy is clearly beginning to get implemented. GW is the same as its always beenAbsolutely not. Since the galactic power thing has been implemented, for example, the last node passed from "fightable teams which are at your level and can beat you exactly as you can beat them" to "whole g12 teams which don't let you even make a move". I don't know if you're a wallet warrior, but if you are I see why you don't have this problem.

GW is an ever changing challenge, everyday is different. I love it. I started playing a couple of days before New Year, now I started beating GW 5/7 days and all was right in my world. Then all of a sudden I couldn't beat it. I was only winning 1/7 so I beefed up my supporting teams and started to be a bit more tactical. Back up to 5/7. Then I started regularly coming up against Chaze and Thrawn and etc and started to struggle. So I started preloading squads for the first 5 battles. Up to 6/7. Now G12 has come along and this time I'm ahead of it, because I just dropped a Zeta on Finn.My point is GW is an adaptive part of the game. If you keep doing the same stuff, you can expect to get progressively worse results...

No you don't have to play Resistance. Resistance is the best Team to finish GW consistently but it's not the only way out. You can also build a Phoenix team you'll use to go through most of the nodes while you'll keep your killer teams for node 11 and 12. Before my Resistance team, I used to send two killer teams on nodes 1 and 2 so they build turn meter, then Phoenix squad on nodes 3 to 10 and, finally, my killer teams back on nodes 11 and 12 with a TM advantage. Not as consistent as the Resistance but it still worked pretty great for me. But that was before G12 and CLS...

The people who are saying it hasn't changed either have not been playing long or very lucky.Since the last update it's become increasingly difficult the last 2 to 3 nodes are very hard. And final node is all gear 12 with most with Zeta's, how the hell can you compete with that without spending hundreds of dollars? There is no way a F2P player can already have a full team all gear 12. I have played this game since launch and I love it, but I have noticed players quitting as they can't keep up with the whales. It should be based off each players lists that way all can have a decent chance of completing it. It doesn't affect me I just throw more teams at it, I just feel for the players that haven't got deep benches.

"Dante;c-1267603" wrote:"b3n;c-1267312" wrote:The people who are saying it hasn't changed either have not been playing long or very lucky.Since the last update it's become increasingly difficult the last 2 to 3 nodes are very hard. And final node is all gear 12 with most with Zeta's, how the hell can you compete with that without spending hundreds of dollars? There is no way a F2P player can already have a full team all gear 12. I have played this game since launch and I love it, but I have noticed players quitting as they can't keep up with the whales. It should be based off each players lists that way all can have a decent chance of completing it. It doesn't affect me I just throw more teams at it, I just feel for the players that haven't got deep benches.I totally agree man. They say GW is based of arena or something like that. But if you're rank 50 in your shard, give or take - it does not make any sense to face squads that are most likely top 5 shard. They do need to revamp GW because it's getting out of hand. The only people who say it's based off arena are people who have no idea what they're talking about.

Galactic War | EA Forums

28 Replies

lDante_1134
8 years ago
"DatBoi;c-1265045" wrote:
"Drazhar;c-1265042" wrote:
Well, how can I put that. I'm not complaining about people spending money. There's people which spend whole salaries every month in the game, so whatever, I will not because I have a life and more important thing to pay. Not so much of a problem. The problem occurs when the game forces you to deal with very high grade shoppers to proceed in the game, thing that you cannot do while being a ftp unless you played since day 1. That's what I'm pointing out: the pay to play philosophy is clearly beginning to get implemented.

GW is the same as its always been

So you're telling me that you've always faced squads with 5x Gear12 characters and 4-7zetas ? =))))
lDante_1134
8 years ago
"b3n;c-1267312" wrote:
The people who are saying it hasn't changed either have not been playing long or very lucky.
Since the last update it's become increasingly difficult the last 2 to 3 nodes are very hard. And final node is all gear 12 with most with Zeta's, how the hell can you compete with that without spending hundreds of dollars? There is no way a F2P player can already have a full team all gear 12. I have played this game since launch and I love it, but I have noticed players quitting as they can't keep up with the whales. It should be based off each players lists that way all can have a decent chance of completing it. It doesn't affect me I just throw more teams at it, I just feel for the players that haven't got deep benches.

I totally agree man. They say GW is based of arena or something like that. But if you're rank 50 in your shard, give or take - it does not make any sense to face squads that are most likely top 5 shard. They do need to revamp GW because it's getting out of hand.
LiathSW
8 years ago
"Dante;c-1267603" wrote:
"b3n;c-1267312" wrote:
The people who are saying it hasn't changed either have not been playing long or very lucky.
Since the last update it's become increasingly difficult the last 2 to 3 nodes are very hard. And final node is all gear 12 with most with Zeta's, how the hell can you compete with that without spending hundreds of dollars? There is no way a F2P player can already have a full team all gear 12. I have played this game since launch and I love it, but I have noticed players quitting as they can't keep up with the whales. It should be based off each players lists that way all can have a decent chance of completing it. It doesn't affect me I just throw more teams at it, I just feel for the players that haven't got deep benches.

I totally agree man. They say GW is based of arena or something like that. But if you're rank 50 in your shard, give or take - it does not make any sense to face squads that are most likely top 5 shard. They do need to revamp GW because it's getting out of hand.

The only people who say it's based off arena are people who have no idea what they're talking about.
lDante_1134
8 years ago
"Liath;c-1267615" wrote:
"Dante;c-1267603" wrote:
"b3n;c-1267312" wrote:
The people who are saying it hasn't changed either have not been playing long or very lucky.
Since the last update it's become increasingly difficult the last 2 to 3 nodes are very hard. And final node is all gear 12 with most with Zeta's, how the hell can you compete with that without spending hundreds of dollars? There is no way a F2P player can already have a full team all gear 12. I have played this game since launch and I love it, but I have noticed players quitting as they can't keep up with the whales. It should be based off each players lists that way all can have a decent chance of completing it. It doesn't affect me I just throw more teams at it, I just feel for the players that haven't got deep benches.

I totally agree man. They say GW is based of arena or something like that. But if you're rank 50 in your shard, give or take - it does not make any sense to face squads that are most likely top 5 shard. They do need to revamp GW because it's getting out of hand.

The only people who say it's based off arena are people who have no idea what they're talking about.

Lol, most devs and YouTubers say it's based of arena. Also each node has a Player name on it....so maybe you don't know what you're talking about
LiathSW
8 years ago
Please provide any source of a dev saying that your arena rank has any impact whatsoever on GW.
BrtStlnd
8 years ago
"Liath;c-1267679" wrote:
Please provide any source of a dev saying that your arena rank has any impact whatsoever on GW.

It does exist. I’ve seen it quoted before from a developer. The quote I saw said it was based on the highest power squad you’ve won with in arena.
LiathSW
8 years ago
"BrtStlnd;c-1267682" wrote:
"Liath;c-1267679" wrote:
Please provide any source of a dev saying that your arena rank has any impact whatsoever on GW.

It does exist. I’ve seen it quoted before from a developer. The quote I saw said it was based on the highest power squad you’ve won with in arena.

There's been a longstanding debate about whether it is just squads you've used in arena, squads you've used in GW, or both. There is substantial evidence of people breaking their nodes through the use of certain teams in GW itself, so it is absolutely not just based on arena.

But the point I was responding to was the one about rank 50 vs. rank 5. Your arena RANK has absolutely nothing to do with GW.
BrtStlnd
8 years ago
"Liath;c-1267685" wrote:
"BrtStlnd;c-1267682" wrote:
"Liath;c-1267679" wrote:
Please provide any source of a dev saying that your arena rank has any impact whatsoever on GW.

It does exist. I’ve seen it quoted before from a developer. The quote I saw said it was based on the highest power squad you’ve won with in arena.

There's been a longstanding debate about whether it is just squads you've used in arena, squads you've used in GW, or both. There is substantial evidence of people breaking their nodes through the use of certain teams in GW itself, so it is absolutely not just based on arena.

But the point I was responding to was the one about rank 50 vs. rank 5. Your arena RANK has absolutely nothing to do with GW.

It has nothing to do with your rank, correct.

Forum Discussion

Galactic War

28 Replies

About SWGOH General Discussion

Recent Discussions

Extra Life Rewards

Can Zeffo be open for CMs/Plops if Bracca is being sandbagged (no stars)?

Ships

5 shards short of Omega reward.

Jar Jar?