Give us the option for GAC.
Give us the option to choose between 3 vs 3 and 5 vs 5 at each GAC sign up. Let those of us that want to do 5 vs 5 play 5’s and those that want to do 3 vs 3 play 3’s.
Forum Discussion
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2457349" wrote:"nfidel2k;c-2457348" wrote:"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2457332" wrote:"PeachyPeachSWGOH;c-2457306" wrote:
It is known that lots of folks simply sign up and skip battles in 3v3 because they don't like it. They end up doing just fine in the game otherwise. It is a perfectly fine solution.
Not sure how good "just fine" is. But, in OP's opinion, it could be better. So, rather than explaining why the status quo is "just fine", can you tell me why it's better than OP's proposition? If not, your response is not relevant to the discussion."PeachyPeachSWGOH;c-2457306" wrote:
Maybe most of us prefer 5v5 better because kits/teams are designed for 5v5, but that is the point of 3v3 - to get us out of the comfortable zone. There are many other things CG put in the game that are not meant to be liked but to challenge us outside of our comfortable zone. 3v3 is actually one of the things that come with lesser costs if skipped. Just a temporary income drop which you'll be able to mostly earn back later.
I agree that paying 3v3 little to no mind, which I have done for a while, is essentially revenue neutral. But, GAC is more to me than a source of income in game, so telling me I get the same rewards is not sufficient. Because with OP's suggestion, I would get the same income AND have more fun.
You are assuming that the rewards would stay the same. Most likely they would be reduced, as splitting the GAC into two ladders means two groups of rewards, which would essentially double the payouts. Unless you think that 3v3 and 5v5 would be run independent of eachother yet ranked together?
I would love separate ladders now, but that's a different discussion.
I think I see what you're saying, and I had not considered it before. Assuming there were 2 ladders , now there would be 2 #1 players each season. I don't see any other impacts to rewards beyond the season ending rewards. If there were only one ladder, that could lead to other unfair outcomes as well.
How CG would choose to manage such a change could impact my approval of the change. Great point, thank you.
Yes, but it would affect daily payouts as well, because they are based on division. There would be two Kyber 1s, 2s, etc. And whether they considered a flat reduction to rewards or something like cutting the size of the divisions, either way you slice it it would mean a cut for a lot of people. Unless you manage to hit a similar rank in both leagues, which is basically the current system.
